Thanks to all answered my question. Lenz's Law does not affect our daily life till today but, only that Lenz's Law explained only what is being seen, not the actual behaviour on the induction takes place.
Aurthor D has mentioned the Lenz's Law and the word 'opposes', this is the key word in the law and this is more applicable for incoming magnetic field, how about leaving magnetic field?
[The circuit inducess a current such that the produced magetic field tends to maintain (or hold) the same as the leaving magnetic field]
'maintain' or 'hold' here means following the same magnetic pole as the leaving field, don't you think this a contradiction with 'opposes'?
Last year, I took about 6 months kept on going arround this law and found the contradiction or mistake/error within. If you are interested, send your email address to: amane@singnet.com.sg.
I'll send you the full explanation; bit long though. In it, it also proves the incompleteness of Fleming's LHR & RHR as well.
2006-08-07 18:19:37 · 2 answers · asked by Kotami 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
If you can do it, then build a perpetual motion machine or anti gravity device as soon as possible!
;-D I want to ride a hover car like in Star Wars I. Gooo Luke!
2006-08-07 18:48:58 · answer #1 · answered by China Jon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lenz's regulation is like saying a million+2+3=6 precisely it truly is distinctly uncertain that it truly is a probability to hit upon a flaw in it. If someone can hit upon a flaw, then certain, it can disillusioned a large type of math theories. ;-D do not wager on searching a flaw.
2016-11-23 15:24:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋