Murtha did not wait until the trial was over or even an invesstigation to accuse our troops of atrocities. He deserves to be charged with treason.
2006-08-07 17:29:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Two weeks ago, Murtha created a storm of comment when he called for U.S. troops to leave Iraq now. The Democratic congressman spoke to a group of community and business leaders in Latrobe on Wednesday, the same day President Bush said troops would be withdrawn when they've achieved victory, not under an artificial deadline set by politicians.
Murtha predicted most troops will be out of Iraq within a year.
"I predict he'll make it look like we're staying the course," Murtha said, referring to Bush. "Staying the course is not a policy."
Murtha, 73, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations defense subcommittee, expressed pessimism about Iraq's stability and said the Iraqis know who the insurgents are, but don't always share that information with U.S. troops. He said a civil war is likely because of ongoing factionalism among Sunni Arabs, and Kurds and Shiites.
He also said he was wrong to vote to support the war.
What a pathetic waste of a politician. He has no honor for his country and does not deserve to be in office. If he feels so strongly why isn't he coming up with any suggestions for a withdrawal or a way to finish the war? Because he is a useless politician who is only out for himself, just like most of them are nowadays.
2006-08-08 00:00:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mr. Murtha actually fought for our Country, as did Kerry, as did I. Your real traitor is Bush who helpd organize and plan 9/11, and then got carried away in greed and started middle eastern wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. He never served because he was a desserter during the Viet Nam war. (and he desserted while on American soil! Coward...)
Oh, and you should actually serve your country before you question those of us who gave you that right.
2006-08-08 00:02:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Raxxillion 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a conservative, I think they're are many others who need to be tried for treason first. He was a hero who perhaps received a brain injury that is only now showing itself.
2006-08-07 23:58:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why?
For speaking his mind?
Murtha served honorably in Vietnam and is a hero.
What war have you served in?
2006-08-07 23:58:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by da_lizard_of_ozz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not wait until the trial is over before you call him a liar and accuse him of treason?
2006-08-07 23:56:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeremy C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freedom of Speech.
It's a basic tenet of our Constitution.
2006-08-08 00:35:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by LatexSolarBeef 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he spoke what he believe to be true. Much like Bush, only he knew HE was lying.
2006-08-07 23:57:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES KERRY TO
2006-08-07 23:59:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
or the truth,,, disastrous
2006-08-07 23:56:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋