English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

yup. still your fault regardless of the faulty post office.

2006-08-07 15:49:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You may want to ask a lawyer (or city official that deals with housing), but my guess is they shouldn't be able to if it was post-marked on the due date.

However, because of stuff like this, it's often recomended that you send payment in at least a few days before the due date, so they have no qualms about "OMG your payment is late, I'm going to charge you extra!" (and I would send it insured, certified, or registered so that if the post office loses your mail, it's their butt on the line, not yours).

2006-08-07 15:51:30 · answer #2 · answered by komodo_gold 4 · 0 0

On our properties we go by the postmark, because we know how jacked up the mail service is here. We sent out 3-day notices on the 5th once and they were not postmarked until the 8th. Had to virtually loose 3 more days of looking for our $$$ due to postal service.

2006-08-08 07:46:23 · answer #3 · answered by educated guess 5 · 0 0

Your employ could typically comprise the frame of mind of delivery/charge association for the lease. you should adhere to that approach. If the owner has continuously come with the help of contained in the previous to p.c.. it up, and that is your association, he/she will be in a position to't merely substitute it hastily. yet in case you've continuously mailed previous cheques, then you definately won't be able to all of surprising substitute the association both. you should envision inclusive of your state or provincial landlord/tenant authority, and your employ, to work out no matter if it truly is criminal to value you a overdue value. This appears like a petty dispute...i recommend that you do what you could to keep the relationship on reliable words. You under no circumstances recognize once you'll choose a favour with paying the lease some days overdue, or an excellent reference on your next landlord.

2016-11-23 15:13:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes ,being a land lord I know and in california,you are to mail it to where it gets to him on time.or yes you will be subject to a late fee. but I go by the post mark and then decide if a late fee is nessary.

2006-08-07 15:53:17 · answer #5 · answered by macki4 4 · 0 0

Depends on when the post office time stamped the envelope. If the post office processed it before the date it was due, you're fine.

2006-08-07 15:50:38 · answer #6 · answered by london_calling 2 · 0 0

you should give your lanlord post-dated checks if you have a 1 yr lease.Makes life easy..and you know for sure they he can't charge you late fees , unless you don't have sufficient funds in your account.

2006-08-07 15:50:06 · answer #7 · answered by Natasha B 4 · 0 0

depends on ur contract/Leese with your landlord, but im NOT sure about the califonia law, and if there is a specific law regarding it.

2006-08-07 15:50:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

post mark chks used to work but now pmnt now has to post by due date; see if landlord can do paypay xfer for faster pmnt or bill pay from your acct to his/hers

2006-08-07 15:55:05 · answer #9 · answered by speedyjr28 3 · 0 0

Yes it is your responsibility to get it to him by the late date. Doesnt matter how.

2006-08-07 15:49:54 · answer #10 · answered by jeffrey k 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers