Clinton and Kerry lied about WMD's ?

Question

Given the same evidence, both Clinton and Kerry jumped on the bandwagon relating to WMD's in Iraq. Why don't we crucify them too ?

What a bunch of biased sorry excuse answers. Don't know why I bothered trying to show the hypocracy since its beyond most of you. I will be withdrawing this question unless some intellegent people get it.

Answer 1

I understand your question, and it is a good question. It seems people have a very bad memory or, if you will, "selective" memory. Iraq stalled the U.N. team that was checking up on them to see where the wmd were. Of course, with all of their stall tactics as well as the U.N. dragging their feet, as usual, the wmd's were taken to Syria. My fear is that all of these people that don't believe that, they will find out the hard way one day. It is just like Hezbollah, for the past 6 years has been preparing for this war with Israel. They have the underground bunkers built, they have the missiles, everything went just the way they planned, yet people want to accuse Israel of starting all of this? I truely fear for our country because of so many people refusing to see what is really going on.

Answer 2

regardless of what others have written depending on this question, the Demons and the genuine nut-interest lefties like Slobbo Moore pronounced as W a liar for this invasion. One poster pronounced as it undesirable intel, and that is the tale that the conventional public has been given, and more often than not conventional. The criminal reasoning for the attack became Iraq's failure to satisfy diverse UN resolutions. u.s. ought to were more effective constructive served by technique of imposing a destruction challenge that concentrated the Iraqi militia and infrastructure. on the end of that objective we ought to continuously have packed up and waltzed on back domicile leaving the carnage for the Iraqi's to freshen up. This act ought to have effectively castrated Saddam and left different paltry regimes to think about if a similar ought to happen to them. there'll be no wins in Iraq or Afghanistan because faith and a lack of coaching received't enable it. the US is dropping money and lives by technique of pretending replace can extremely happen there.

Answer 3

because the president is where the buck stops. the minority party of the legislature is responsible? good one... why can't the president be the person who is ultimately responsible for decisions affecting the army? is he the commander-in-chief or not?

why are your standards so ****ing low that you tolerate this administration. hypocracy implies they decieved us, and that is not implied the way it is with all of cheney's warmongering with pnac. you are so studiously ignorant you ostrich. we're still there and he still insists it's a good idea. does that not bother you? is the most productive thing you can do point at the minority party that can't do anything? your guys really ****ed up this time. still all worried about blowjobs?

Answer 4

Because they didnt launch a war thats killed 30,000 people and counting. They might have thought there were WMD's but they are the types to CONFIRM suspicions before killing. Bush is more "Kill tens of thousands first, ask questions later".

Answer 5

Clinton did not lie about weapons of mass destruction, just like he did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky! Please, he and Kerry are not runninng this nation. I believe each administration does the best they can with the information they have. Let's not crucify anyone.

Answer 6

They are not in office and therefore it would not be "popular" to crucify them. The media knows the stories on Bush and his policies are the moneymakers so while they may not be lying, they certainly aren't telling the whole truth to us.

Answer 7

I don't recall the US, EVER EVER invading a country before without provocation.

Bush was not "given" that information. He and his team created that information. It was a lie then, it is a lie now and it will always be a lie.

Answer 8

because the hypocritical News media & DemonCrats would Holler ..."Intolerant !!! let's revolt against Capitalism & Free society. Down with the republicans!"
So it goes...socialist demonCrats + special interests touch me feel me News Media are Scum.

Answer 9

Because they didn't run up a huge deficit, run the country into the ground, kill thousands of our young people (troops) and create $3.00/gallon gas prices.

Answer 10

because they were smart enough to protect the usa from terrorist attacks. this all happened on bushy's watch. the buck stops with him, not what could have happened or what if that happened in the past.