1) hezbollah isn't a country, Lebanon is.
2) Israel has already penetrated many miles into Lebanon
3) The Israelis aren't afraid of the dirty hezbollah
4) Yes, the hezbollah (which means Party of Fudgepackers) are using Russian supplied Anti-Tank weapons supplied by Iran, via Syria, which is how the hezbollah have been able to achieve some success against the Israeli tanks.
5) Last I checked, it was the punk a ss hezbollah who were positioning their Katyusha rockets on apartment buildings and next to mosques.
2006-08-07 14:33:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by 2007_Shelby_GT500 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hezbollah surely changed into to blame for each thing. The Israelites gave them land for peace and what did Hezbollah do yet start up a warfare again for sure because the Muslims aren't any further satisfied till they are killing Jews and Christians. The Lebanese voters were stuck contained in the crossfire. If someone broke into your position, what could you in easy words do stand there and do not something???? Hezbollah changed into continuously throwing missiles into Israel so that they fought decrease back. Israel could have complete them off in the adventure that they were no longer made to sense undesirable about protecting themselves. in my opinion i believe that Hezbollah could were taken out, because now they are going to in easy words do all of it yet again once they could. They continuously have.
2016-11-23 15:08:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a question, George Bush is already doing this by supplying Israel the latest weapons, and Israelis are pretty good at sitting in the fancy jets they were given and throwing bombs from high up on top of civilians including lots of children and turning at least a fifth of the population of a nation into homeless refugees...and their men in office, Bush, Blair, and Harper the Christian in Canada be at their beck and call!
2006-08-07 15:01:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by peace m 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unequivocally YES!
2006-08-07 14:31:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no, we need to bring our troops home from Iraq, we should though, leave all mexicans in the military over in Iraq, they'll fit right in with their brownie friends, screw illegals.
2006-08-07 14:31:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, we should stay out of other people's buisness, that's how we got in trouble in the first place, Ex. Vietnam, Iraq....
2006-08-07 15:05:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by RATM 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I think Bush should help...But only if "HE'S" on the front line!!(Then see how long it will last)
2006-08-07 14:51:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by rhajha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as he wears his body armor and knows how to shoot an M16.
2006-08-07 14:51:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by TVC15 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are actually asking whether USA should go against Iran....and we all know Iran will fight to the death of every last Syrian.
2006-08-07 14:31:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you willing to be in the army that goes in?
2006-08-07 14:31:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by jxt299 7
·
0⤊
0⤋