his public defender is saying that he most likely get 9-16 months and he has already served 6 and has yet to be arraigned. he has no prior record and the robbery was unarmed. he supposedly got away with 7 grand. i was just wondering how realistic is it for him to get 9-16 months considering this crime? it seems like too much of a lenient sentence for a crime like this. please answer if u have knowledge of this or your opinions are welcome
2006-08-07 14:04:12 · 5 answers · asked by John D 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
you're right...it is lenient, he needs to go for years, and years to prison...not just any prison, but pound-in-the-butt-everytime-he... Maybe that way, he will learn not to do stupid things...that money could be my hard-earned money for all I know...who the hell does he think he is? I think you should go with him for accessory to a crime....for repeating the same question over and over, and over...
2006-08-07 14:22:01 · answer #1 · answered by Player 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not going to happen. He'll serve at least 5 and probably 10 years, unless he rats out accomplices or something.
2006-08-07 14:20:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What, you think if you post this question in other categories than no one will notice that this is one of ten of the exact same questions? You forgot to mention Lancaster in this one.
2006-08-11 09:56:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well first of all, how old is he? Is your friend a minor or adult? That would make a big difference.
2006-08-07 14:11:27 · answer #4 · answered by mageta8 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its very likely.
2006-08-07 14:07:40 · answer #5 · answered by forbs k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋