Just curious. There's just bound a couple of them. Just bound to be!!!!
2006-08-07 13:20:57 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
None. Unless they're mainstream Protestant ministers, or Republican politicians who are pretending to be straight.
2006-08-07 13:25:45 · answer #1 · answered by Austin W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like somebody just implied, if there are any, they are probably the self-loathing sort.
I am not ashamed to be gay, and I don't "oppose" equal marital rights for gay couples, if it were a legislative option. That is, my vote -- if and when I vote on the subject -- is to vote for equal rights to marriage (or any other alternative option, such as "civil unions"). But one way I am very ashamed of the gay community is when all these people delude themselves into thinking that the U.S. Constitution (or any state constitution) was designed by people who wanted to grant equal rights on the basis of sexual orientation. I have studied constituitonal law quite a lot, as a lay person, and with what I have seen, I know that it is quite easy for judges to lie and claim that the 14th amendment protects equal rights for gays. The Court's rulings in Romer v. Evans and Lawrence v. Texas were full of lies.
I am not "against gay marriage," I am just very strongly against the wrong people legalizing it.
2006-08-07 20:50:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not against it, but I'm not for it either. I don't really care. It's stupid really. I can see where couples would want a legal right as far as their partner is concerned and it might be beneficial in insurance and tax matters. But I would not and do not need to "be married" to someone to be with them. That's such a girl thing. It's stupid that gay people would even want to do it.
Unless gay people are going to perfect it and not have divorce, then why bother? They will just end up as ridiculous as hetero couples.
2006-08-07 20:48:04 · answer #3 · answered by grrandram 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are some holdovers from the late-60's "free love" era that see the desire for marriage equality as a "caving in" heterosexual standards and "mimicking straight lifestyle".
They represent a very small minority of the gay/lesbian populations (maybe 5%).
2006-08-07 20:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try society and culture, then cultures and groups. There is a lesbian gay section there. You will probably get more answers there
2006-08-07 20:26:31 · answer #5 · answered by 20mommy05 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter probably is. I mean, come on, she's a Republican for heaven's sake! How much of an oxymoron is THAT?!?!?
2006-08-07 20:26:02 · answer #6 · answered by Celticlassie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am only against gay honeymoons.
2006-08-07 20:25:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many: some priests
2006-08-07 20:25:38 · answer #8 · answered by CAUTION!!! 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very interesting question.
2006-08-07 20:25:12 · answer #9 · answered by Evey 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
?????
2006-08-07 20:24:45 · answer #10 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋