No....his cabinet would have been filled with inexperience to help him, and after 9/11 our country would have gone through an even bigger depression than the early 90's.
2006-08-07 13:17:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by jpxc99 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We do not have a choice in our elections. Vote for whoever you want but when it comes down to it we will get Dem. or Rep. One or the other and I am SICK of it. Political parties nowadays are a JOKE and are taking advantage of the people who vote for them by not truly representing them. Oh yeah they can defend there platforms like crazy but I want some ACTION, not the bickering back and forth. A lot of issues are pissing the people of the U.S. and the world off right now and our politicians are doing NOTHING. They fire back and forth at each other about who's paryt is better and don't really solve any problems. Poltitcal parties also get in the way of a real person getting far up the ladder by controlling the media during the elections and telling lies about what they are going to do. They are causing a huge rift by letting these issues drag on and the entire world is mocking us and our leadership because they are doing nothing but argue with each other about things. Our politicans need a boot in the kiester to get things going and start making decisions. I don't care anymore what really happens with the issue I just want them to solve something for a change and not just argue about it. The longer issues go unresolved, the bigger the rift will get until we all reach our breaking points. I love my freedom to vote but we don't really have a choice because, until we really wan't a change, it will be a Democrat or Republican every time and we will not see any changes for the better. No I will never again vote for a member of any political party.
2006-08-07 13:57:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just want to clarify a gross error by a prior posting. The interview with blitzer was edited either by the poster or someone else. Gore never made the statement "I invented the Internet" as was written in the post. The correct quote is as follows:
But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.
Gore is clearly referring to his work on initiatives in congress that helped to form what would be the Internet, and what he said was absolutely true, he should have worded it differently.
This type of editorial license is typical and i would suggest that everyone should be somewhat skeptical and do a little research themselves
2006-08-11 10:58:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by trouthunter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Al Gore: "I invented the internet."
Transcript: Vice President Gore on CNN's 'Late Edition'
BLITZER: I want to get to some of the substance of domestic and international issues in a minute, but let's just wrap up a little bit of the politics right now.
Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley, a friend of yours, a former colleague in the Senate? What do you have to bring to this that he doesn't necessarily bring to this process?
GORE: Well, I will be offering -- I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.
But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I invented the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.
Ken Lay Bragged That Gore Had "Solicited" His Views On Global Warming.
"In an August 1997 memo by Mr. Lay to all Enron employees, the chairman said Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore had 'solicited' his view on how to address the issue of global warning 'in advance of a climate treaty to be negotiated at an internationalconference.' That memo said Mr. Clinton agreed a market-based solution, such as
emissions trading, was the answer to reducing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere."(Jerry Seper, "Enron Gave Cash To Democrats, Sought Pact Help," The Washington Times,
January 16, 2002)
The Clinton-Gore Administration's Global Warming Agreement Would Have Helped Enron.
"The Clinton administration's interest in an international agreement to combat global warming also dovetailed with Enron's business plans. Enron officials envisioned the company at the center of a new trading system,in which industries worldwide could buy and sell credits to emit carbon dioxide as
part of a strategy to reduce greenhouse gases. Such a system would curtail the use of inefficient coal-fired power plants that emitted large amounts of carbon dioxide,while encouraging new investments in gas-fired plants and pipelines -- precisely Enron'sline of business." (Dan Morgan, "Enron Also Courted Democrats,"
The Washington Post, January 13, 2002)
2006-08-07 13:17:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Al Gore would have been a better president. Nope, wait a minute, he did win the 2000 elections. He should have been had it not been for those screwed up butterfly ballots. Bush should thank the Supreme Court for making him the president.
2006-08-07 15:09:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by tyrone b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why don't you put this in your hat and smoke it.....Al Gore, made a speech where he claims the President played on OUR FEARS!!! about 911.
Well just what exactly is that good for nothing HACK of a LOSER & EX! vice president doing now with "global warming" and trying to sell the "global warming" idea as a viable trading stock on the stock exchange. "AL GORE PLAYS ON YOUR FEARS" !
AL GORE was and still is a LOSER!!!! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha !!!!!
2006-08-07 13:23:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not so sure, pal. It goes down with other very difficult questions to answer like "Would Mother Theresa make a better baby sitter than Jack-the-Ripper?" and "Would Cindy Sheahan be a better hunting partner than Dick Cheney?" These are too close to call.
2006-08-07 13:20:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The hottest month of July was recorded in 1936. No I don't think that IDIOT could be better at anything then spewin off at the mouth about stuff he don't know a d------ thing about!
So much for his global warming!
2006-08-07 13:43:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-08-07 13:18:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by curiousgeorgia 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Alfred E. Neuman (the Mad Magazine mascot) would have made a better president the rich man's dumb son.
2006-08-07 14:02:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rory McRandall 3
·
0⤊
0⤋