no 2 nuclear power plants in scotland. we dont need them .we dont want another chernobyl.
2006-08-07 12:00:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well we have to put them somewhere and it makes sense to put them somewhere that wouldn't be missed if it was oblitarated, I say build some in Wales and Ireland as well and then we can get rid of all the crap at the same time.
2006-08-11 02:59:49 · answer #1 · answered by fattommy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i really don't see there being any Chernobyl repeat on Scottish soil
however at present Scotland is producing excess power to its requirements so why would we need any more? we don't.
just another argument for full and proper devolution lets hope next time round its not raining and we'll get enough of a voter turn out
2006-08-07 19:18:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, of course it doesn't.
You are right, the risk is too great and you should campaign against them - I will support you.
I have only been to Scotland a few times, but I love it. The wildlife there needs protection.
Go to your local MP and your national MP and get their support.
We all need to take care of our planet and take more repsonsibilty.
For a campaign against this, see:
http://cca.movingpages.org/diffentquestion.htm
Also try Friends of the Earth:
http://www.foe-scotland.org.uk/press/pr20050314.html
There are lots of site that may help you - do a search and chekc them out.
I Hope the ones I have suggested are helpful. :>)
I am not a Tory, but check out the Conservative site for Scotland and get your local Tory MP to support you:
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/2006/02/ft_tories_may_n.html
2006-08-07 19:05:17 · answer #3 · answered by jayteaches 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes we do,i think nuclear power is the way to go,its a lot safer now,in the future we will all be powerd by nuclear power,everyone is scared of it but it is the only way to go.
2006-08-07 19:10:16 · answer #4 · answered by Spook 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't like the dam things ether. I live in Indianapolis,In(USA) and the nearest one to me is a two hour drive north from me in Chicago.
2006-08-07 19:24:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say yes because England bled them dry of their natural resources namely OIL
2006-08-09 10:04:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,
No one need...Government keep taking of patents of easy energy..Solar, and wind could really make all the work, but they don't want..
2006-08-10 22:34:37 · answer #7 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no just get the locals to wrap up and run around abit.
They could have a rota to who holds the candle.
2006-08-07 19:09:16 · answer #8 · answered by robynbiker 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They have lots of heather and thistles, so they don't need more plants of any description.
2006-08-07 19:05:55 · answer #9 · answered by Mungo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
2006-08-07 19:14:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋