Or are they simply one-sided, not covering the Israeli side of things?
2006-08-07 11:31:55 · 9 answers · asked by Day of Acerbity 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
MSM = Main Stream Media.
Try to keep up!
2006-08-07 11:37:41 · update #1
That one photo emphasizing the dust is just the beginning. The liberal media is on the side of the terrorists and will stop at nothing to make sure Bush doesn't win. I guess some people are afraid of success.
2006-08-07 11:37:38 · answer #1 · answered by breyer 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The MSM (main stream media) is a comedy act of sorts. I remember after 9/11 they showed a video of some Palestinians cheering that I had seen years ago. It is a hoax.
2006-08-07 18:43:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The MSM (Miserable Sado-Masochists) have their own agenda where Israel (and the US by extension) is always wrong and the poor, misunderstood terrorists are always right. It would not surprise me that they are lying to support their outlandish stories.
MSM=main stream media
2006-08-07 18:37:33 · answer #3 · answered by Modest intellect 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You got one-sided reporting, (distortion, outright lies and clever photo editing,) and anti-Israel bias is the latest fad. Reuters, B.B.C., Guardian newspaper, New York Times, etc. etc. have forgotten 9/11 and are now supporting the Arabs.
Lovely
2006-08-07 18:42:48 · answer #4 · answered by Dan S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They weren't "caught". They found out one of their independent photographers, who was a Lebanese citizen, had sent them a doctored photograph.
They fired the photographer and will never purchase photographs from him again.
As to the rest of your question, treating the entire media -- every company out there doing any sort of news reporting -- as one entity, and attributing one agenda to it, is so massively irrational as a generalization that it doesn't even bear comment.
2006-08-07 18:42:16 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't know MSM!
2006-08-07 18:36:46 · answer #6 · answered by Wounded duckmate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off, it is MSN. Second off, it wasn't MSN, it was Reuters.
2006-08-07 18:36:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES! and YES!
2006-08-07 18:43:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably
2006-08-07 18:35:39 · answer #9 · answered by robert p 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋