*woman with out her man is nothing*
It will be interesting to see how you think.......
2006-08-07 11:22:39 · 11 answers · asked by Chapstick 3 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
Old Lady, you are wrong. And where exactly is the "spelling error" you were talking about??
2006-08-07 11:45:23 · update #1
Old Lady, you are wrong. And where exactly is the "spelling error" you were talking about?? Or is it that space that's bugging you??? I don't think that's as big of a deal as you tried to make it..... so sorry.
2006-08-07 11:47:45 · update #2
An English professor wrote the words, “Woman without her man is nothing” on the blackboard and directed his students to punctuate it correctly.
The men wrote: “Woman, without her man, is nothing.”
The women wrote: “Woman: Without her, man is nothing.”
2006-08-07 11:36:37 · answer #1 · answered by Seaman 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well now, this is interesting. There is a spelling error here, which nullifies the whole thing.
Had you said, "woman without her man is nothing" one possible punctuation could have been "Woman! Without her, man is nothing."
But the corollary could not be said, as that would have to be
"A woman, without her man, is nothing." and that introductory particle is missing.
However, as neither of those fits within your parameters, there isn't much else to do with that sentence.
2006-08-07 11:35:27 · answer #2 · answered by old lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A woman without her man is nothing.
2006-08-07 14:12:00 · answer #3 · answered by smokey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A woman is much more important than man.
2006-08-07 11:35:14 · answer #4 · answered by Writer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A woman without. Her man is nothing.
Sounds kinda Zen, huh? XD
2006-08-07 11:28:35 · answer #5 · answered by Phantazy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Woman; without her, man is nothing.
2006-08-07 12:21:15 · answer #6 · answered by Alex 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
woman, without her man, is nothing
woman: without her man, is nothing
woman: without her: man is nothing
woman, without her; man is nothing
2006-08-07 11:35:00 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*woman, without her, man is nothing*
2006-08-07 11:27:36 · answer #8 · answered by Mark T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Mark T. Very clever. I didn't see it at first.
2006-08-07 13:17:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in accordance to what you printed: That, it is, is. That, it is not, isn't. That, it is, isn't that. it is not that, it is not. isn't that, it is? Is that not it? that's.
2016-10-15 11:30:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋