i mean, it's a bit sick innit? wiping your bottoms on cute little puppies.
2006-08-07 09:58:51 · 13 answers · asked by lillyflower 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
would have preffered printed Tony Blairs
2006-08-07 10:02:21 · answer #1 · answered by banditblue1200 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is weird. And yes, personal choice is an issue - they could make a fortune selling toilet paper with hatesome figures, not sure about it legally. Maybe a type that has a cheap printing press available - picture on it, and whizz off a roll!
2006-08-07 10:04:41 · answer #2 · answered by Chris cc 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just goes to show that parents can't take the time to be parents anymore. Let someone else raise the kids! Even the toilet paper companies get it!
2006-08-07 10:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by cgspitfire 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not like there making little puppies print the paper in sweat shops in third world countries
2006-08-09 23:55:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah.. same with Bounty and their prints on paper towels.. I don't find it much.. something better than the bland white paper..lol
2006-08-07 10:03:34 · answer #5 · answered by xx_ladyxluck_xx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it certainly doesn't support the 'a puppy is not just for xmas' campaign, its more like 'a puppy is just for wiping your bum on'.
2006-08-08 03:31:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it's cool it's just a picture i use white only but it's no harm being done to live puppies
2006-08-07 10:03:57 · answer #7 · answered by Mrs. Butler ♥2 B♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
suppose it is, so why not print Tony Blair's on them as I've had enough of his crap just lately, lets see him have some of mine.
2006-08-11 06:59:59 · answer #8 · answered by Robert H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing wrong with drowning puppies
2006-08-07 10:04:31 · answer #9 · answered by toontaxidriver 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There not real there puppets
2006-08-07 10:02:52 · answer #10 · answered by pat e 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋