Even after all these years, has your opinion changed about rather or not OJ Simpson, brutally murdered his ex wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. I know this question probably gets on people's nerves and if so, don't bother answering it, i'm just curious about how everybody feels about the case, 12 years later. I do appreciate your honesty, in answering my question. When these murders first happened, I thought he was innocent, but when the trial started and all this evidence came out, I thought he was guilty and nothing has changed my mind, of his guilt. I never could understand how he could take his own childrens mother from them and look them in the face every day, it's so sad.
2006-08-07 09:34:35 · 18 answers · asked by A_WWE_FAN_4LYFE 6 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Like almost everyone here, I felt he was guilty all the time, and the idea he goes free bothers me. I respect you for asking this question. The justice system in North America is not really a justice system, but a legal system. The ones with the money can hire the best defense. Watching the trial on TV was great. We cant see that in Canada, so it makes me think our legal system is even more in dis-repute than yours. I thought the DNA evidense against OJ was insurmountable, but I was wrong. In the end, we still have to feel safe that the cops can not throw us in jail without a good defense, unless of course we cant afford a good defense. Our system is not perfect but much better than most. OJ would be toast in China!
2006-08-07 10:04:47 · answer #1 · answered by cbmaclean 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the USA, the judicial system gives only two choices, "Guilty" & "Not Guilty". It would be a travesty to find a person guilty if there were any chance they did not commit the crime in question.
In Scotland, a person can be found "Guilty", "Not Guilty" or "Not Proven". Had O.J. been tried in Scotland, I have no doubt the verdict would have been "Not Proven", meaning, in effect, of course he did it but he had some good lawyers.
I'm amazed he has not been kidnapped and (slowly) tortured to death by now. Nicole & Ronald's families are far better people than I think I could be in their situation!
2006-08-07 16:58:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Think ABOUT THIS:
If the glove does not fit you must acquit.
To Wit:
How would that glove fit it was covered in blood? Now what does blood do when it hardens, it pulls together correct. Now consider OJ held his hand out with a rubber glove and his hand out stretched. Now how would the glove have fit on his hand?
Well it wouldn't the glove was constricted by blood on the outside and possibly inside and the rubber glove in such a fashion would cause friction.
So that is American justice in a nut Shell
2006-08-07 16:42:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to OJ he is still hard at work trying to find the 'real' killer. Someone should tell him he can start looking other places besides golf courses.
2006-08-07 16:39:28 · answer #4 · answered by indianalee 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Still guilty-but he is looking for the real killer on the golf course.
2006-08-07 17:40:21 · answer #5 · answered by hope 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope, I think he is guilty as home made sin, but money talks, if you got money you can get away with murder
2006-08-07 16:55:14 · answer #6 · answered by Granny 1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, my opinion hasn't changed. The evidence pointed to him then and it still does.
2006-08-07 16:37:47 · answer #7 · answered by curiositycat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lets see here... why does this matter when 1000s of people are killed everyday and are not even given any pity... guess what... if your mom was killed im sure you would be extremely sad... but the rest of america doesnt care so why is this different?
2006-08-07 16:59:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, my opinion is still the same. Guilty!
2006-08-07 16:39:01 · answer #9 · answered by aaaaa 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The man drools blood. Notice his s*hit eat-ting smile. He will meet satin.
2006-08-07 16:57:20 · answer #10 · answered by Patty 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋