2006-08-07 08:15:31 · 9 answers · asked by Olivia 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think its inevitable. Its not gonna happen until the US withdraws, that's for sure. And rightfully so, the US won't leave until Iraq is secure.
2006-08-07 08:18:59 · answer #1 · answered by mattiebouge 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I disagree with you.. BUT
If it is inevitable, we should remain so that we can keep provinces secure or those who want to avoid the civil war. Basically keep a safe zone for the women, chil;dren, and elderly, and those who just dont want to fight.
If we are sure that it is a true civil war, and not iranian mercenaries vs iraqis, then i see it as thier right to fight eachother if the diahreah has brewed that high for them.
If its a true iraqi vs iraqi civil war, those arent passing thoughts to fight and die. Theyre deep rooted. Those thoughts for those who want a civil war arent spur of the moment that will be given up easily, or have thier minds changed. Those truly who want a civil war will only win or loose, live or die.
2006-08-07 08:21:29 · answer #2 · answered by kool_rock_ski_stickem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of it is going to alter right into a civil war, because of fact we are speaking approximately tribe against tribe and at that time you could not communicate related to the subject concerns, its on too consumer-friendly a point. you have one tribe that has controlled the rustic below Saddam and persecuted the different tribe. Now the positions are reversed and you have one factor now waiting to take revenge and the different factor which refuses to settle for that they have lost administration (even inspite of the incontrovertible fact that they are the minority occasion). this is now our subject because of fact our troops are caught in the middle and an common objective for the two aspects to vent their anger. they'll try this because of fact they're unable to speak to a minimum of one yet another and choose their ameliorations. As we've seen all worldwide huge the only way a Muslim can handle some thing they do in comparison to is violence, homicide and intimidation. possibly training could help, even inspite of the incontrovertible fact that this could take time. they could desire to learn that violence does not artwork in the long term era, communicate is often the way disputes are resolved, yet they seem to be a protracted way from realising that on the 2d.
2016-11-04 02:00:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's leave! We should never have gone there in the first place. And when you are digging a hole the best way to stop the hole from deepening is to stop shoveling!
Then we send Bush and the cabal of Evil to the Hague to stand trial.
2006-08-07 08:20:04 · answer #4 · answered by Edward K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
civil war started after we took Saddam out
I don't know what we can accomplish there
should we sit and referee for a couple of generations until the grievances are forgotten?
2006-08-07 08:27:07 · answer #5 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!
We should pull back to the border, and drop leaflets telling those that wish it, to surrender and walk to the border.
Then bomb everything flat with MOABs , burn it with fuel-air explosives form Tomahawks, and let them start over.
No more terrorists!
2006-08-07 16:28:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's liberal of you .
Cut and run leaving them to live or die .
It is our National Interest to stay and finish the job .
2006-08-07 08:32:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well seeing as how you created it i think you should leave well alone, you caused too much trouble already.
2006-08-07 08:20:27 · answer #8 · answered by challenger 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT"S ON WE SHOULD LET THEM RESOLVE IT WHO CAME TO OUR SIDE TWEEN THE NORTH& THE SOUTHUSA
2006-08-07 08:20:22 · answer #9 · answered by Penney S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋