This is, by the way, not an abortion discussion.
What the phuck!
2006-08-07 08:38:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question is about the value of life. There are two paradigms cooking in the hearts of mankind. One is about power. The other is about goodness. For example, 50% of all pregnancies end in abortion, spontaneous abortion, or, miscarriage. One way that we can effectively reduce the number of miscarriages is with prenatal care, which can reduce the numbers of miscarriage by half. Therefore, with prenatal care we can save 25% of all pregnancies. That's a lot of babies ... a lot of life. Yet, the same religious groups that oppose abortion are the same groups that have forced massive reductions in prenatal care funding in the U.S.. Their true paradigm is not about goodness or the value of life but about power, about who should be allowed the power to take a life, or, in the example of prenatal care, about who they feel is "worthy enough" to be afforded care to protect their unborn's life. Some people believe that only God, men and governments should have the power to take a life (war/capital punishment/natural selection based on wealth and advantage). Those anti-abortionists are not as interested in the value of life as they are in engineering who has more power than others. Religions that sanction war and killing, as is occuring in the Middle East, are seeking POWER, not goodness... not the sanctity of life. Power seekers are fearful. When they are afraid, they point their fingers at others, rather than look at themselves. Perhaps that is why some Americans ignore the plight of children in this country and "feel" for the children elsewhere. Also, I believe that most Americans know in their hearts that American owned businesses have certainly caused some of the chaos in the Middle East and they feel guilt and shame.
2006-08-07 10:17:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok... first you say "One word: abortion" and then go on with that issue... then at the end you say "This is, by the way, not an abortion discussion."
You are a walking contradiction my dear...
Either way I totally agree with you. Perhaps this happens so that people will see that killing is killing, no matter how, when and where?? It's sad really.
2006-08-07 08:23:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pivoine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you 100% on this. We are so worried about children in other countries, when our own children at home are dying. We have children being aborted, killed, and starving from hunger, and no one sees it as a problem. People just ignore it. This has nothing to do with politics, but everything to do with whether or not we really love our children. It does not seem like many Americans do.
2006-08-07 08:19:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Andrea 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the ethical situation with beginning administration. BC works in 3 techniques. First 2 techniques preclude being pregnant, the third makes it to the place in case you do get pregnant the fertilized egg won't be ready to attach to your uterus, hence forcing an abortion of the egg. we don't use BC subsequently the two. We too wish to have as many by way of fact the Lord factors, by way of fact He does let us know to be fruitful and multiply (among different scriptures). i think of that it incredibly is relatively no person's company. For some reason human beings sense that they ought to get to tell others the thank you to apply their money, strengthen their teenagers, and so on. in the event that they see elevating Godly infants as a reason, then enable them to strengthen their infants, as many as which may be, the way they see in good shape. They stay debt unfastened and without government counsel so i've got not got any proceedings approximately them. as long as she is in good wellbeing and the toddlers are fantastic, I see no reason for them to place the breaks on. and that i've got friends that are own friends of the family contributors and the youngsters are no longer weird and wonderful, unsocial freaks. they seem to be a mind-blowing family contributors and that i want a million/2 of the single or 2 infants residences have been raised as wonderfully as they are.
2016-12-11 04:35:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because some of us can chew gum AND walk upstairs.....meaning we can think about more then one thing at a time.
Abortions huh?? Are you willing to adopt 5 babies of whatever race happens to be made available...right now?? if your answer is No..then shut up about something that doesnt concern you. Your a male..after all..and you dont/never should have a say in the process over a womans right to choose. YOUR not a woman!!
Next theyll give females the right to choose which males have a vasectomy..be careful what you wish for.
2006-08-07 08:20:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by G-Bear 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
becuz, the baby that you abort is unborn. it is not the same as killing innocent children in lebenon. do you know why people get abortions? because they don't want to the child or unwanted pregnancys! it's not like the child is born and then you are killing it! the child doesn't feel anything when a mother gets an abortion! it is not the same as KILLING innocent BORN children in lebenon.
2006-08-07 08:18:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by HELP! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you doing anything about it? I mean, you write about it but are you ACTING on it? Don't pass the buck. You worry about something get involved. You cannot generalize caring.
2006-08-07 09:10:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by daisycarlene 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm concerned about children being hurt anywhere.
2006-08-07 08:28:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋