John and Paul were both born on the 14th of June 1972, they both have the same biological parents but are not twins! why
2006-08-07 07:57:16 · 17 answers · asked by martyn d 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
OK OK stop now we have a winner. John and Paul also had another brother/sister born on the same day and therefore were triplets. well done Neshad
you can get the 10 p[oints when i can award them in 4 hours or so
2006-08-07 08:07:33 · update #1
If they were born on the same date and had the same parents, then they are Triplets! Am i right?
2006-08-07 08:01:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Their brother Tony makes them triplets?
2006-08-07 08:02:38 · answer #2 · answered by Mike P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Part of triplets or multiple birth
2006-08-07 08:02:12 · answer #3 · answered by MsCymru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it hasn't been confirmed yet, but I've heard this one before and it's definitely the triplet answer.
2006-08-07 08:04:17 · answer #4 · answered by chris_ninety1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they were born at differant times of the day
2006-08-07 08:00:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe because they were not conceived at the same time or one was born from a surrogate or quadruplets: two pairs of identical twins and one from each.
2006-08-07 08:12:24 · answer #6 · answered by mimi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One was born as a surrogate child
2006-08-07 08:04:46 · answer #7 · answered by cammy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excellent. Triplets or more. Didn't get that until above got it. I like that one.
2006-08-07 08:03:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Multiple birth.
2006-08-07 08:06:29 · answer #9 · answered by Justeag 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They must be triplets
2006-08-07 08:03:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋