English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-07 06:00:16 · 10 answers · asked by Olivia 4 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Because he's a fanatical leftist liar. He's another Michael Moore.

2006-08-07 06:05:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Earth has had ice ages, they were cooling periods, between them were warming periods. This has been going on for all of Earth’s 4 billion years. This all happened before any of the modern day came into being and will continue after we are gone.

The Earth is going through a pole shift right now. A pole shift is when the magnetic poles swap polarities. During pole shifts the magnetosphere is weaker and more of the Sun’s rays strike the Earth, this causes extra heating of the Earths surface, and makes global warming more pronounced.

These are natural cycles of the Earth. We puny stupid humans can no more stop or even reduce a natural cycle of the Earth, than the man in the moon. This is 9th grade science, and one would think that scientists and politicians would be better educated, but it seems that this not so, and they could remember 9th grade science class too.

This may just may be another smoke and mirrors propaganda campaign to cover our governments lies and con games. There are so many conspiracies running rampant it’s hard to tell which are real and which are just simple stupidity. The idea we can stop global warming IS stupidity at it’s highest form.

He's stupid in it's highest form!

2006-08-08 00:24:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Besides the obvious:


Al Gore: "I invented the internet."

Transcript: Vice President Gore on CNN's 'Late Edition'

BLITZER: I want to get to some of the substance of domestic and international issues in a minute, but let's just wrap up a little bit of the politics right now.

Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley, a friend of yours, a former colleague in the Senate? What do you have to bring to this that he doesn't necessarily bring to this process?

GORE: Well, I will be offering -- I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.

But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I invented the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.


Ken Lay Bragged That Gore Had "Solicited" His Views On Global Warming.

"In an August 1997 memo by Mr. Lay to all Enron employees, the chairman said
Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore had 'solicited' his view on how to address the issue of
global warning 'in advance of a climate treaty to be negotiated at an international
conference.' That memo said Mr. Clinton agreed a market-based solution, such as
emissions trading, was the answer to reducing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere."
(Jerry Seper, "Enron Gave Cash To Democrats, Sought Pact Help," The Washington Times,
January 16, 2002)

The Clinton-Gore Administration's Global Warming Agreement Would Have Helped Enron.

"The Clinton administration's interest in an international agreement to
combat global warming also dovetailed with Enron's business plans.
Enron officials envisioned the company at the center of a new trading system,
in which industries worldwide could buy and sell credits to emit carbon dioxide as
part of a strategy to reduce greenhouse gases. Such a system would curtail the use
of inefficient coal-fired power plants that emitted large amounts of carbon dioxide,
while encouraging new investments in gas-fired plants and pipelines -- precisely Enron's
line of business." (Dan Morgan, "Enron Also Courted Democrats,"
The Washington Post, January 13, 2002)

2006-08-07 13:06:25 · answer #3 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 0 0

1. "..no controlling legal authority.." to justify his violation of campaign finance laws.
2. Ice tea tinkle defense to justify his violation of campaign finance laws.
3. Kyoto and the rest of the global warming scam
4. Invented the internet - gee, Vice President Von Munchausen, can you tell us another story?
5. Pot-smoking college flunkee - left Vietnam early to attend divinity school, which he flunked out of because all he did was get high.
6. His environmental tracts read like the Unabomber's. Not exactly the symbol of sanity.
7. His actions in Florida in 2000 to overturn Bush's legal election.
8. His knee-padded support of Clinton.

2006-08-07 13:16:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because he doesn't believe in the issues he promotes, just gives lip service to environmental issues....so if you lie about one thing, then what about the others...Suddenly he became a pro-environmentalist against global warming....this is not a new problem...why didn't he advocate it before...it has been no secret for many years....this is political hogwash....now would you trust him about Oil Wells in Alaska...or more serious issues with our international relationships...our problem with Mexico especially and watch him sweep it under the rug?

2006-08-07 13:28:09 · answer #5 · answered by Frank 6 · 0 0

I am a Democrat ,but I am not a fan of Mr.Gore,
My reasons are more based on my personal reactions to him that a long list of half truths our right lies.
I simply don't like him as the person I see on TV.
He like Jeb Bro Bush are simply not qualified to be president,but wait ,that not being qualified never has stopped GWB has it ....Well there goes my argument lol

2006-08-07 13:17:17 · answer #6 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0 0

Cause he running with a Jew/Zionista as his running mate and the corruption in America would get much worse because of it

2006-08-07 13:07:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He hates his country and he makes money propagating the lie that we'll all die in 10 years if we drive cars.

2006-08-07 13:07:59 · answer #8 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0 0

He is an out of control Liberal.....he stands for socialist ways....

2006-08-07 13:07:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because his policies and mine don't agree. Duh.

2006-08-07 13:15:08 · answer #10 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers