What do you think of this link with regard to DUH-bya and his Treasonous acts?

Question

http://www.strike-the-root.com/51/johnson/johnson4.html

I'm on lunch :)

MadSky, Welcome back, we missed your candor.

Answer 1

I agree with the Iraq part, but I do not agree with his diatribe against the Jews, though it is obvious that it has cost us!

You don't turn turn back on people for expediency!

And to the misinformed above, the Marine Barracks was bombed in 1983 when Reagan was president, who did absolutely nothing!! Quit blaming Clinton!!

Answer 2

I think it inflames people, that it further polarizes. W had the power to take the country into war, it wasn't "treason".

Bush may have expanded the power of the executive office more than what was intended by the framers of the constitution. Presidents have been expanding their power for a while, since the mid 1800's actually, but Bush's unitary executive theory goes a bit farther. He often claims the right to interpret laws passed by Congress in a unique way via his "signing statements". He may be usurping some of the functions of the legislature and the judiciary when he does this, but there has been no action by the republican controlled gov't to restrain him. He may have disregarded a few major statutes regarding surveillance and the need for warrants, but he has gotten legal opinions from his own lawyers, Gonzales and the justice dept. that say this is ok, so he has covered himself. But none of this is treason.

Answer 3

Not a bush fan, but thats still absurd. Treason is a defined act against a country, not a subjective interpretation of policy.

You might argue that use of signing statements to override Geneva Conventions constitutes war crimes, or that association with Karl Rove's release of the name of one of our agensts is treason, but he hardly makes that point well.

Answer 4

Dr DD
You changed your hair.
Clinton supported Ahmed Chabali's attempts to over throw Saddam and ignored the acts of terrorism...direct attacks against American civilians and armed forces throughout his tenor. (WTC 2/26/93, USS Cole, African embassies and Bali nightclubs). Yet no mention of that?
The link is moronic babble and the supporting arguments would be tossed out of even Californian courts.

Answer 5

Where do you find these items? I can't say I think much of this link...because its an editorial...and you know what they say about opinions. The way I see it, the treasonous acts are coming from the way left wing in Congress...the Clintons, and the Boxers, and even the Sheehans...you see she's back?

p.s...aren't you supposed to be working???? I am sooo telling your boss. ;)

Answer 6

I hope Bush is impeached. That is the only way the truth will unfold, and many of his supporters here will committ suicide because they will be forced to see what we already know.

Answer 7

THIS IS SO FULL OF SH1T. IF THAT'S THE CASE CLINTON SHOULD BE HUNG ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN FOR THE BOMBING OF THE MARINE BARRACKS FOR THE FIRST ATTACK ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTER AND FOR THE BOMBING OF THE USS COLE. BUBBA SHOULD HANG.

Answer 8

Just another uninformed liberal, or maybe he is but because of blind raging hate, spreads untruthful crap.