If today's media had existed in WWII, would the Manhattan Project have remained a secret?

Question

Or would the media DEMAND to know what is going on?

For those of you who attended a government sanctioned child abuse indoctrination center (public school), that was the project that developed the atomic bomb.

Answer 1

No, they would be like LOL WE BUILDIN A BIG BOMB JAPAN, U BETTER BUILD ONE B4 US.

Answer 2

Interesting question, but not a simple answer. Sure there will always be government projects that are kept in secret, It is better that the public doesn't know everything. But durnig WWII people were still getting over WWI. The country was united behind the soldiers and supported them, and was more interested about helping win the war and what they could do for the war effort. So the media focused on that. And in that time of war, the entire country was forced to deal with the reality that they either stop it over there or the Germans could pose the risk of bringing war to the US soil. At that time the media wouldn't even dare try to force an issue with the government. If they tried, it would have been looked at as a threat to national security. Individuals would have been jailed, and that would have been that. Today, the greatest threat to our soldiers and our own safety here at home IS the media. Watch the news reports closely, they report where things went wrong and how they went wrong. They report weaknesses in our police forces, fire departments, and national security. They do all the leg work for people who want to see bad things happen in our country, only for them to turn on the evening news. So to answer your question, today's media would most likely have been shot as traitors during the WWII effort.

Answer 3

Yes, it would have.

You don't see blueprints for stealth fighters and ICBMs posted on media websites, and you don't see the NYT listing current deployment schedules for covert ops units.

There's a difference between revealing actual secrets during a time of declared war, and telling the public what is already common knowledge during what will be a decades long political agenda. There's a difference between telling people what weapons the government is building to end a war, and pointing out where the government is conducting illegal programs on its own citizens.

People need to realize that distinctions matter. It's not always black or white. There are some things the people (citizens) need to know, such as what laws are being enacted and whether the government is breaking those laws. There are other things the people don't need to know YET, like what specific scientific research is being done. It makes a difference.

Answer 4

WWII grew to become right into a thoroughly different adventure, and that i think of you already know that already. The civilain inhabitants grew to become into asked to take a extensive volume of the burden of battling that war, in comparison to promptly wherein the common non-militia citizen provides not something to the war attempt. there grew to become into rationing, war bond determining to purchase (we could not positioned wars on chinese language credit enjoying cards returned then) and THE DRAFT, wherein electorate have been definitely conscripted into the militia to combat the war. individuals knew what we've been battling for. We have been attacked by ability of a foriegn national rigidity, not a team of criminals. We declared war on the rustic that attacked us, not on a rustic that had not something to do with the attack. i admire the way you attempt to describe how militia deaths do not count selection as much as popular human beings deaths. Is that your thought of "recognize for the militia?" while one fights a militia in the thousands of thousands, as we did WITH OUR ALLIES at Normandy, the casualties would be plenty larger. while one fights in yet another united states of america's civil war, which contain this united states of america's solo sojurn in Iraq, there will be fewer casualties. that doesn't recommend that those adult males and ladies count selection much less or are "perfect losses." Any sort of casualties in this war is important. So, to answer your inane question, specific.

Answer 5

Considering how the Bluebird and Stealth Bomber programs got in under the radar (so to speak), yes, there still can be a secret held.

Answer 6

U seem to believe that the current government secrets are all known to the media. its not.

Answer 7

Not for as long as it did.... yet, the Skunk Works has managed to keep the media's long leftist nose out(under the threat of death) of their operations for many years.

Answer 8

no, the NY times would defend our enemy's right to know about it.

Answer 9

we would be speaking german