English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A close analysis of the American-French draft - the fingerprints of John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, were almost smudging the paragraphs - showed just who is running Washington's Middle East policy: Israel. And one wondered how even Tony Blair would want to associate himself with this nonsense. It made no reference to the obscenely barbaric violence employed by Israel - just a sleek reference to "hundreds of deaths and injuries on both sides" - and it made only passing reference to Hizbollah's demand that it would only release the two Israeli soldiers it captured on 12 July in return for Lebanese and other Arab prisoners in Israeli jails.

http://www.jewwatch.com/

2006-08-07 05:26:58 · 5 answers · asked by Biomimetik 3 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

The IA PAC is a major contributor to both parties... The truth is the average Israeli has better representation in the US congress than the average American.

2006-08-07 05:40:36 · answer #1 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0 1

No there is not any threat of a draft interior the situation you're speaking of. there will be no floor troops in Syria. it quite is achieveable that the West and the Arab international might desire to start arming the Syrian rebels if Assad does not halt the violence. it quite is achieveable that america might desire to attack Iran, yet no desire for a draft. remember, they fought Iraq to a draw interior the Eighties and we thrashed Iraq two times. Iranian troops are poorly geared up and poorly experienced. 250,000 US troops and yet another 50,000 British troops might do it. That 250,000 parent might comprise 50,000 marines. Iran has a militia of 465,000 lively accountability squaddies and yet another 350,000 in reserve forces. they even have militias, besides the reality that particularly susceptible. So no, no draft needed. With that suggested, I nevertheless think of it quite is gonna be Israel launching airstrikes against Iran's nuclear centers and much less. As for Syria, regardless of if there grew to become right into a conflict, Israel might desire to guard them, and that they've interior the previous.

2016-12-11 08:56:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The "barbaric violence" of which you speak becomes much less barbaric when your meida photo editors stop using Photoshop on their pictures.

Oh, by the way: Israel must be cleaning the Hezbos' clocks. If the Hezbos were winning, the world wouldn't be calling for a cease-fire, would they?

2006-08-07 05:36:23 · answer #3 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0 0

Why would any sane person waste their time reading Jewish conspiracy stupidities? We prefer truth to your twisted delusions.

2006-08-07 05:43:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is there a question in there somewhere?!?

Pontificating is fun, isn't it!?!

2006-08-07 05:32:01 · answer #5 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers