English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Like what would it do for us that ordinary trig wouldn't do? Does it simply let us work out angles on non-right-angled-triangles? Wouldn't sine rules be enough for that?

2006-08-07 05:21:35 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

Obviously it's not 'a cotangents'; it's a typo.

2006-08-07 05:22:45 · update #1

3 answers

I don't use cotangents very often (just like I don't use secant or cosecant very often). Sines, cosines, and tangents are usually enough to do the job. And even sometimes with tangents, I change them to sines and cosines.

On the other hand, I don't like trig functions in the denominator if I can help it. So instead of saying "one over sine x," I'd rather say "cosecant x" just to avoid using a denominator. The same applies to cotangents.

So I guess they're there mainly for convenience. You don't have to use them if you don't want to.

2006-08-07 05:40:02 · answer #1 · answered by bpiguy 7 · 1 0

The three 'primary' trig functions (sin, cos, and tan) are useful in a lot of areas (as you should know)

The 'inverse' trig functions

secant = 1/cos
cosecant = 1/sin
cotangent = 1/tan ( = cos/sin)

also have their uses. In particular, in mathematics, it's simply easier to use them than to bother with inverses and fractions.


Doug

2006-08-07 12:40:43 · answer #2 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 1 0

i know its a natural sign when calculating intergals... its easier when you use the sign rules together...

2006-08-07 12:34:46 · answer #3 · answered by stupidgirl 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers