My earlier answer was completely off the mark. Questioned about that previous answer, I did some research, and found the following in an article on differential geometry, which I'll paraphrase.
A line in a plane can be written in parametric form, x = x(t), y = y(t), so that any point is determined as a function of t.
A curved surface S in 3-space can be written in parametric form, x = x(u,v), y = y(u,v), z = z(u,v), so that any point is determined as a function of u and v. This formulation is due to Gauss.
The Euclidean distance formula between two points (x, y, z) and (x+dx, y+dy, z+dz) is ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2.
A line in the curved surface S may be described by a function v = f(u).
If the differential elements of the parametric equations for x, y, and z are determined (probably the total differentials, using two partials) as dx, dy, and dz, all of which are functions of u and v, and if these are inserted into the Euclidean distance formula above, the result (which is a function of u and v only) takes the form
ds^2 = Edu^2 + 2Fdudv + Gdv^2
where the coefficients E, F, and G involve only the first derivatives of x, y, and z with respect to u and v.
Now if, in addition, v is a function of u, then the length of a curve in the curved surface S can be determined by integrating an expression of the form ds = g(u)du.
There's more to the article, but this is the idea. In your question, you're interested in the case where E = F = G = 1. My guess is that may be a special (or degenerate) case of the x, y, and z functions (such as the "curved surface" S being a plane or a sphere, for example).
Anyway, this is a lot better than my first answer.
2006-08-07 04:34:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by bpiguy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋