Or is she just one wacko person. Should we worry about her doing something stupid?
2006-08-07 03:59:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think she is a lady who has grown bitter at the loss of her son and needs to grieve and get help for her not being able to get past it. She has allowed her not getting past it to ruin her relationship with her husband. She needs professional help.
She does a dishonor to her son in protesting because he wanted to serve his country and she sends a clear message that she did not support her son in his decisions.
2006-08-07 04:06:16 · answer #1 · answered by rltouhe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is a mother who cares deeply about her son being killed in a war that was dishonestly manufactured to help Bush and Cheney and their rich oil grubbing friends get richer at the expense of thousands of young men and women in America. It's an illegal war that never should have happened and will never benefit this country or that country. Has there ever been a "Saint Cindi" before? This might just be the time.
2006-08-07 04:13:22 · answer #2 · answered by EMAILSKIP 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She opposes a war that tens of millions of Americans also oppose. The organization that she is a part of has thousands of members, and hundreds of thousands of direct supporters. Her initial motivation may be more personal than abstract, but that doesn't make her wacko.
It's unlike she or her particular movement will do anything radical or dangerous. Others might, but if she didn't do anything like that at the height of her personal grief over losing her son, it's unlikely that she'll do so now.
Radicals tend to only be dangerous when they are caught up in the emotion of their cause and unable to think logically. Her movement sets forth rational and logical arguments to support their position, even if an equal number of people disagree with those arguments. It's the people who start off setting fire to buildings, throwing blood or feces at people, or interfering with funeral marches who are likely to escalate to even more dangerous practices.
2006-08-07 04:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even though I totally disagree with what she is doing, I believe she is a pawn for the democratic party. She just hasn't seen it yet. When the war in Iraq is finished no one will come knocking on her door or calling her number. That is the sad truth.
2006-08-07 04:18:55 · answer #4 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you have far more to worry about with others doing something stupid...can you say government? Think maybe she's getting some help with this? Sorry about anwering a questions with questions:)
2006-08-09 08:39:16 · answer #5 · answered by Mistchf 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anyone who has direct experience with the current conflict has the right to demonstrate in any way they choose.
2006-08-07 04:04:25 · answer #6 · answered by pamspraises 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SHE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO PROTEST THIS WAR!!! SHE LOST HER ONLY SON TO A WAR THAT WAS BASED ON A LIE!!!! SHE DOES NOT WANT ANY OTHER MOTHER TO LOSE THEIR CHILD TO A WAR THAT HAS COST THE LIVES OF SO MANY. FOR WHAT CAUSE HAVE THEY DIED FOR? OSAMA STILL DOES NOT LIVE IN IRAQ.
2006-08-07 04:17:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Her son died for a stupid pointless war. Unfortunately your piece-of-crap kids are still here.
2006-08-07 04:12:23 · answer #8 · answered by RepublicansAreFookingRetards 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
she is just another dummicrat nut case
turn the lights out they all sound the same
2006-08-07 04:03:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
is this who i think it is?
2006-08-07 04:12:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋