English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Lack of credible intelligence, lack of cohesiveness among intelligence agencies and lack of planning.

2006-08-07 03:17:48 · answer #1 · answered by Sir J 7 · 0 1

Rice wasn't even in the cabinet yet. The others had no idea how it would or where it would happen. Anything but speculation would have been a help. There were no tips on date, time, location, method. Only vague ideas proceeded the attacks. Imminent means "it will occur for sure given all the knowns". We didn't have that.

2006-08-07 03:22:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Given that 911 was AT LEAST a massive failure of intelligence and security, how come nobody in the administration has been sacked, repremanded or tried for criminal negligence specifically for the 911 attacks?

I suggest that they let it happen, just like the Anthrax attacks just after them.

Who was responsible for those BTW? did they ever catch the person who stole that weapons grade Ames strain of anthrax from the Ft Maryland Bio-weapons lab and mail it out pretending to be an arab?

Like the US would never target americans with their terror weapons? sheesh! Oh and that ames strain of anthrax was 1000% more deadly than anything Saddams people ever managed to develop (prior to those facilities being destroyed in the mid 1990's) and still when that deadly, weaponised Ames strain of anthrax was distrubuted widely amongst the population of major American Cities, only 6 people died. Some terror weapon that! wow 6 people in a whole city!

Given that, how was Saddam ever a threat? at the time of the invasion, he no longer had any WMD, and when he did possess WMD in the 1980's it was WMD that was innefective and harmless goo.

2006-08-07 03:23:39 · answer #3 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0 0

Why didn't Clinton, and Gore do anything to stop terrorist attacks when they know they were imminent? After all it was under Clinton's administration that those terrorists came in and out of the country FREELY, even though they were wanted.

2006-08-07 03:21:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Didn't you hear???? Clinton planned it all along to make Bush look bad. Bush didn't have enough time to do it. Some think that Gore was involved too and that is why he lost the election.

You conspiracy nuts simply amaze me. Do you also believe FDR planned Pearl Harbor to get us out of the depression?

2006-08-07 03:20:49 · answer #5 · answered by gtoacp 5 · 0 0

You get reelected when there is a war. Money is really the root to this evel, just look at the price of anything next time you shop and then compare it from a month form now.

2006-08-07 03:18:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Some people say it was planned by those in power themselves.
I don't know what to think but I remember we all had a much more complacent mind set before that terrible tragedy.
That probably had a lot to do with their failure to act, if that is in fact the truth.

2006-08-07 03:23:24 · answer #7 · answered by curious 2 · 0 0

i believe that our government don't really care about the people.. i really believe that it all about the money and oil... look at the gas price's Americans can not afford these price's.. after all look who's getting a big pay raise (bush) his family deals in the oil business

2006-08-07 03:19:57 · answer #8 · answered by mistysr 2 · 0 0

a itemizing of human beings have opted out of the administration for assorted reasons -- Rumsfeld is long gone -- and from what I understand -- with the unqualified advantages of in basic terms approximately anybody that had to handle his conceited butt !! something of those which you have reported herein are nevertheless in place in particular because of gutless nature of what we've left in the soundness of government to stand up against tyranny !! And, the sadest of all is that till now long the full team will "retire" from this rabid experience into hell's final 0.5 acre they have drug us into with lifelong endowments of outrageous sums on the same time as we, the human beings, are left to handle the aftermath of their escapades !!! you're transforming into a pair of issues that are somewhat off on your statements here --- however the middle of the fact remains rock sturdy fact ---- they lied their butts off to pull this united states of america right into a war that the full lot needed long till now 9 / 11 (administration officers definitely went on checklist EARLY in Junior's first time era pointing out that "night issues up in Iraq grew to become into going to be a concern" ) it is to declare not something yet a point out of the thousands of alternative issues that this team have pulled on the same time as in workplace --- the myriad of "government orders" popping out of the Oval workplace on my own that have circumvented the form on a brilliant sort of ranges it boggles the techniques to attempt to maintain up with all of it --- and ALL in the call of "national secure practices" !!!! So, the reason --- the gutless Congress !!!

2016-11-04 01:34:27 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That's like asking why OJ didn't do anything to stop the murder of his wife. Yes, I am implying what you think I'm implying.

2006-08-07 04:19:09 · answer #10 · answered by someguy 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers