2006-08-07 00:48:04 · 22 answers · asked by PATRICK C 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
No.
Because he has lost the respect of a lot of the country though his relationship with 'Queen' Camilla during his marriage.
2006-08-07 00:51:35 · answer #1 · answered by 'Dr Greene' 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He might make a good King of Charlieland but otherwise I don't think so. I think that he is too self-absorbed; he thinks that he is so important and he's not, he's got a room temperate IQ, he is frequently an embarassment - hey wait a minute - sorry those are all the attributes of 'good Kings' down the ages so maybe he would be a good King. They say Good save the King - I say God save the Commonwealth if he is King, because I think you will see Australia and Canada leave and the others won't be far behind. Who wants to bow and scrape to these people any more? Their day is over, they are an irrelevance in today's world. They draw in tourists because the Windsors are a Circus but to seriously say that they should have any part in Government is to toy with things that should be important.
2006-08-07 11:09:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he would, Prince Charles is a lovely person and he is also his own person and refuses to be pushed around by anyone, he has guts and understands people, he does a lot of good work and is finally happy with the woman he has loved for many years, he would be a terrific king and long may he reign.
2006-08-07 17:24:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The most important agreement of Prince Charles becoming a good King is whether or not he is qualified for Cyborg Citizenship. There may be disagreements about him between bioLuddites and transhumanists over who we should grant Loyalty citizenship, with all its rights and protections.
BioLuddites advocate "human-racism", that citizenship and rights have something to do with simply having a human genome. Transhumanists, along with bioethicists and the Western democratic tradition itself, believe citizenship should be based on "personhood," having feelings and consciousness. As a CYBORG I have feelings and a conscious,so my vote for Prince Charles is becoming for a good King.
2006-08-07 10:15:06 · answer #4 · answered by Duchess B LiebriasLiebrestes 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably, but he'd certainly better than a republic
We need a buffer between our political idiots and the country
Charles may give the impression of a buffoon at times but he does have an independent viewpoint - and doesn't need to think about lining his pockets as many politicians do
I like his stance on global warming and other green issues
It's time our so called leaders took these problems seriously but as they are some (possibly short) time in the future no one in short-term office seems to care. Getting re-elected and continuing to boost their assets is their main priority
2006-08-07 13:06:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think he has the right sense of duty for it, or else he would have handled the Camilla/Diana thing in a much better manner that he did. Thank God he has very little actual power to mess around with. Though, I will admit he seems smart enough, he might not screw it up too badly.
2006-08-07 16:59:40 · answer #6 · answered by Rae 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Because he has no idea of how the ordinary people in the country live.
In order to be allowed to be king I think he should have to live for 6 months on an average wage, in a council flat, take the bus/train to work, shop at Asda/Tesco & generally pay his way. If he can't do it then he doesn't get to be king. I think my idea would make future monarchs think more about their "subjects".
2006-08-07 15:14:07 · answer #7 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No as he is a liar and a cheat who did not care about what his actions did to Diana. And now he has ruined the Royal Family tree with marrying that dreadful Camilla I hope he is NEVER king.
2006-08-07 19:02:35 · answer #8 · answered by butterfly55freedom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep I think so.
He holds strong views about the environment eg. organic farming and he also has done great things with the Prince's Trust.
He has created Poundbury, which is an experiment in town planning but which is apparently thriving.
However his views on modern architecture being ugly, I disagree with.
He's been training for the job since he was born, so I think we can trust him - especially since he knows that his every move is watched.
2006-08-07 16:27:45 · answer #9 · answered by Neil_R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he treated Diana abysmally. He married that Camilla and all that aside he seems completely out of touch with the British public. The extravagent lifestyle him and his family have at the taxpayers expense is disgusting.
2006-08-07 09:42:43 · answer #10 · answered by TB 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not think so. He has some very weird ideas on medical and church. I think that he should pass that down to his son. Charles has weird ideas on women too......but that has nothing to do with the throne.
2006-08-07 07:54:40 · answer #11 · answered by saultdebbie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋