In terms of population control, it wouldn't be a bad idea. China's had much more success than India in that respect.
2006-08-06 14:41:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by elizabeth_ashley44 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well although this mite be an ideal thing to do with indias population booming...it just wont work
Some facts...
1) India is the 7th largest country in the world
2) But, India has the second highest population in the world
3) Indias population is increasing so rapidly that it adds as many ppl that live in Australia to its count every year. (and Australia is bigger than India in terms of territory)
4) India will exceed China's population by 2030....
If not a one child rule.... certain priviliges like ration, subsidies etc. should be given to families that have only one child.
: )
Happy friendship day!!! Have a nice evening!!!
2006-08-06 00:43:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by amitamy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is no grate need to impliment one or none polocy like china.after successful mplimentation of that polocy china is goingt face many problems like the population of dependers are ingreasing than earners.china govt realisethe problem and going to take steps to increase the birth rate.
But according to recent survay india is set to becimde the youngest country by 2010, where one in each three is under 35 the most productive age.
2006-08-06 00:00:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by reddy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do not imagine that having youngsters is the direct situation, yet fairly the training we supply them about making use of the earth's aspects. the U. S. has style of one third India's inhabitants between significantly better territory and yet use only about two times the same aspects. i do not bear in mind the position or after I study that, despite the indisputable fact that it really is actual. yet yeah, perhaps the total international and in no way in easy words India must have a one toddler coverage.
2016-11-23 12:40:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
India is a very liberal country. Such rules will never be made.
I think such a rule is required, but make it 2.
2006-08-06 00:07:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by whatever 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
not 1, but 2. having siblings is a great thing. though in the worlds largest democracy its near to impossible.
2006-08-06 00:35:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kelrec 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, it's actually more cost effective to just kill a bunch of people. Think about it. $400 for a shot to abort a fetus, or $0.20 for a bullet that would kill the mother and the child?
2006-08-05 23:54:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course not what the hell
People can have wahtever kids they want!
2006-08-05 23:53:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jose 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
even they r fed up with that rule
2006-08-05 23:52:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by deepinsidelover 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think it should have
2006-08-06 13:57:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by mspentinum 3
·
0⤊
0⤋