Most Americans are stating that this wasn't his fight - and others are stating this is a vendetta and part II of what his father never finished, while others are stating he is fighting terrorism - so why can't he find Osama?
2006-08-05 23:08:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Camille L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some of you hit the nail on the head. We went to war supposedly to find Weapon's of Mass Destruction, that were simply not found there. Then, came up with the most wanted in the country to eradicate the leadership. This they have accomplished some. They tried to set up a new Gov. over there and they are now finding out that it is corrupt already with BIN Laden crunees already. So, what did that accomplish not much. But, what is all being missed is that Bush has his hand in the cookie jar as far as the OIL and control over some of the prices. He is not stepping in to help keep the prices down. Some people are having to decide what they are going to do. Put gas in the ol' car to get to work or pay other household bills and they are getting behind. The congress is working less and getting paid more than ever before is our history. That's not fair either, they give themselves a pay raise and we have to pay for it. I'd like a job like that wouldn't you? As far as you being out of the country, It may be the country you are in that is blocking out that type of news. Check here at yahoo news, it keeps up pretty good to hit the "highlights".
Alice
2006-08-06 06:41:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alice K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think most of America is angry with Bush just the loud ones. lol I am so sick of hearing that he lied to us about his real reasons for going into Iraq. Almost every country that has a (so called) sophisticated intelligence agency told him that they absolutely believed that Saddam had and was working on WMD's. Based on that info he asked the congress for a vote to do a pre-emptive attack on Iraq. After seeing the same intelligence that the president saw they voted almost unanimously to take out the leadership in Iraq. Recently they did find about 500 WMD's but of course they don't count. It's amazing to me that the Bush haters don't hold their last presidential hopeful John Kerry to the same standards as they do Bush. Or for that matter most of the congress. By their reasoning they all lied to us. I remember Kerry saying in one of his stump speeches "if you don't think that Saddam Hessian is a threat to the free world and shouldn't be taken out then don't vote for me" I am ashamed to say that a party that I once belonged to (the Democrats) is so full of rage and hatred because they lost power in Washington that they are using any all means to discredit a good man. A man who's is trying to do the best he can for his country in a very difficult time. Sure he has made mistakes and I don't agree with some of his policies. But I don't hate him. Their are so many conspiracies flying around that I gave up on trying to keep up with them. Simply put the libs have gone off the deep edge and I think ( and hope) that most of America can see through their plan. Which is to regain their power through discrediting Bush in any and all matters. I have not heard one of their leaders come up with any positive ideas on anything. I don't know what they stand for all I know is they can't stand Bush. Only time will tell how the majority of Americans feel on this. We are going down a dangerous and slipery slope here and it may end up biting us all in the rear. So it's pretty much if your cat fell out of a tree and was killed Bush did it. Why did you know he being the dumbest man in america was smart enough to guide Hurricane Katrina to hit New Orleans last year in just the exact right place so that the people most hurt were poor black folks. The damn racist! Oh yeah and he is worse than Hitler and any terrorist leader because he is trying to shove the choice of individual freedom down the throats of people who lived every waking moment in fear for their very lives. Why how dare him! ok I'll get off my soap box but that's about what I see going on here. Now you will see people if they read this call me a right winged crazed neocon. I am not even a republican lol but I know the truth when I see it.
2006-08-06 06:51:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only because he went to war based on the lie of there being WMD's, which he could and should know didn't exist, and against the expresl will of the UN and almost all allies.
2006-08-06 06:06:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gungnir 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the anger is that we are not convinced that we were given all the facts before making the decision to invade Iraq. Additionally, it was not thought trough.
It is a wonderful example of the checks and balances as well as free speech our Constitution guarantees us.
No one man/woman/ political party is "in charge"!!!! ya' gotta' love it!
2006-08-06 06:55:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by mjohn28497@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
gonna make a movie "DUMMICRATS GONE WILD"
it is simple "W" (Bush) beat them 2 straight elections . the first time he beat a real loser named Gore who thought the liberal courts appointed by Clinton (pervert) ..but he still lost.the second a real sleazy politician by the name of Kerry, well he lost also.so now they rant and rave and howl at the moon lmao
2006-08-06 06:09:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
most americans are not angry at Bush.....you are just viewing the left leaning network news.
2006-08-06 10:39:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by W E J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
its not only the war you can start with steeling fair elections and the right to vote and add on $3:45 a gal gas......................an on an on an on an on
2006-08-06 06:08:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Were you in preschool when you left the States?
2006-08-06 08:05:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by rexski 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
because he lied about why we went to war, said they had wmd's when they didnt, they searched and found nothing yet we still went to war.
2006-08-06 06:06:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by imalickyouallover69 5
·
0⤊
0⤋