Not that ARE but SHOULD.
WHY????????
2006-08-05 22:29:28 · 59 answers · asked by rod 5 in Pets ➔ Other - Pets
ANSWER MORE OF MY QUESTIONS!!!!!
2006-08-05 22:33:45 · update #1
Ants and mosquitoes.
2006-08-13 22:20:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
That is a really good question, but nothing should ever go extinct unless it has fulfilled its reason for being here. If you think about it everything on earth takes it life from something else and then gives something back.
2006-08-13 10:23:29 · answer #2 · answered by alittlefilly1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Panda Bear is a species that should have become extinct over 100 years ago, but human interference has prevented it, so far. The habitats were becoming incompatible with them long before humans came along.
2006-08-05 22:40:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fleas and mosquitos - because of blood borne diseases (not to mention the Black Plague).
Bindi's and Poison Ivy - because they suck!
All of the above serve no real purpose and have no known benefits to man or the animal / plant world.
At least they found a use for leeches and herbs.
2006-08-05 22:45:05 · answer #4 · answered by Sparky5115 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Cheetah. All cheetahs are almost genetically equal to being twins which means that they have almost identical DNA and that biologically all offspring is the result of siblings
With no genetic diversity cheetahs are susceptible to disease that could wipe out the entire species.
Cheetahs have survived this way for 10,000 years. It's amazing really.
2006-08-05 22:40:00 · answer #5 · answered by anthrotistic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
poison ivy and thorn trees because poison ivy makes u itchy and miserable and swell up like u are a balloon and thorn trees because when u are walking along and get a thorn through ur foot after having an innocent walk just plain ruins ur darn day.
as far as the animals i love animals and cannot imagine which ones that should be but pesty rodents would be rats and snakes because rats are plain nasty and snakes i just hate them and terrified of them
2006-08-06 02:35:54 · answer #6 · answered by badgirl41 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bees, because there are one of those vast quantity of human beings whom are allergic to them and they are risky in numbers. I do comprehend that they help create new kinds of plant existence, despite the indisputable fact that, on account that we've one of those vast quantity of scientists dipping and dabbling with each thing and arising new breeds of plant existence, we do not surely want bees. I also incredibly do not see why we want mosquitos both, they are no longer reliable for something except frogs and that i imagine frogs have sufficient of different species of insects to save them fed. i imagine mosquitos are not reliable for something yet shifting ailments from useless carcasses and germs.
2016-11-23 12:37:49 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good lords some folks have patchy information.
One if you didn't have spiders do you know how many bugs would be alive to clinmb/fly/jump/creep all over you? I'm afraid of spiders but I know they do a great job.
Mine - Cane toad. Nothing can kill them in australia ( bar humans) and they are taking over everything and killing the native wildlife.
can't think of a second.
2006-08-05 23:17:05 · answer #8 · answered by Fuzzy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Should because they almost were or should because we don't like them? The buffalo and bald eagle should be extinct because people hunted them to the brink of extinction. Starlings and coyotes should be extinct because I hate them.
2006-08-05 22:34:46 · answer #9 · answered by Fat Guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mosquitos
Roaches
Ants
Bugs Urgghh!
2006-08-05 22:36:21 · answer #10 · answered by GoldenLocs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man. Hes got no survival equipment but a demented brain. And it would be better for the others.
Guava - Smells
Durian - Smells Horrible
2006-08-05 22:33:35 · answer #11 · answered by blind_chameleon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋