Good Muslims
S. Arabia = the most corrupt of all systems in the ME with the least freedoms for its citizens, particularly women.
Egypt = Corrupt administration with a President of 30 years more. Admitted he fixed last election to maintain the status quo in his country.
Jordan = US sponsored monarchy, with no Democracy or public vote.
BAD Muslims
Lebanon = Democratic State with one person one vote. Elected Parliament and popular movement with 90% approval rating.
Palestine = Subjegated people, who had their land stolen by Israel. Popular democracy. 1 person 1 Vote.
Iran = Independent Islamic state and Democracy with 1 person 1 vote. Wants nuclear industry to counter threat of Israel
The difference between both examples is that the first three are US sponsored with our tax dollars. They subjugate their people and worse, the Terrorists we are so afraid of came from these countries.
Is the American mind corrupted by liars and anti-democrats.?
2006-08-05
22:20:45
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Lewis , I despair of people like you. 'British lands' like Africa was 'British Lands'. Your rant is ignored and I wish others do not bother reading it. Shame on you and your interpretation of history.
2006-08-05
23:13:08 ·
update #1
It's not just moslems the American governments play this game with. There's a very old diplomatic axiom which goes: "My enemie's enemy is also my friend." This has been applied over the years, to the Afghanistanis (freedom fighters when they resisted the Soviet Union, dangerous terrorists now), Iraq (Saddam Hussein was a friend of the west and held an artificial country the British and Americans constructed together), and most notably, Al Qaeda, whom the Americans armed, trained and funded before they became Public Enemy No 1, 2 and 3.
2006-08-05 22:25:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
heh well you almost got it right. Here I will fix it.
BAD Muslims
Lebanon = A country that allows a terrorist organization called Hezbollah to exist within its borders.
Palestine = a country that was established in lands owned by the Jews for 3000 years.
Israel = A country on land that has been owned by the Jews for 3000 years and where the roots of the Jewish church are.
Iran = An Islamic extremeist state known for its beliefs that most of the world consider ignorant, dangerous, and war like. Wants nuclear capabilities to be able to create terror in normally peacful countries,.
Ok there ya go !!
2006-08-06 05:31:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by sshazzam 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The problem with Lebanon is not Lebanon, it is the Syrian influence by implanting Hezbullah. 40 percent of Lebanese are Maronite Christians, with a small percentage of Jews. This is unacceptable to Syria. The Christian and Jewish presence in Lebanon, as well as the existence of Israel, also provides a propaganda device so a few politicians can raise money to enrich themselves and complain about an artificial enemy.
Palestine: Most palestinians were immigrants to Israel after the British Empire created the state of Israel from British lands. Very few Palestinians were in the area now called Israel prior to 1948.
Lebanon and Palestine did receive direct US monies until the most recent activities. The US is the largest provider of UN, IMF and World Bank monies, and do not have a line item veto on UN expenditures, or those from the IMF and World Bank.
You left out Pakistan: Another country created by the British Empire with the purpose of establishing a homeland for Muslims in the region of India. Pakistan doesn't have a lot of in-migration.
Pakistan could have been a jewel with their resources and port capacities. What happened? Pakistan didn't even take care of East Pakistan when they were part of them, so they have to separate from Pakistan in a internecine war and form the country of Bangladesh.
Pakistan is the only Islamic state with Nuclear capability, and the USA assisted A Q Khan in obtaining it. Because of his betrayal of the trust reposed in him, and his transfer of technology to other nations, it is now unacceptable for any other Islamic state to develop nuclear weapons. This is the consensus view of the permanent members of the UN Security Council.
Iran: You've obviously never been. Voting is rigged and there are severe repercussions on any voting district that doesn't vote exactly right. Iran is more repressive than Russia. Before Iran was Islamic, it was the Jewel of the Middle East. The Persian Empire was one of the greatest.empires of all times, but was at its zenith before Islam ever existed. Iran, or Persia, or Ar'ya has always been at its best when religion was not a dominant force. I still know Kords, Sufis, Yezidis, and Zoroastrians(Parsees) in Iran, but they must remain secret, for fear of persecution. It will be a genuine tragedy when radical Sunnis nuke Iran and Riyadh.
You have a glimmer of a thought here, but you cloak it in so much manure, few will take you seriously.
Make no mistake. The majority of the world's military and financial powers care little about Islam. Oil is the primary tool Islam has, and if the world went to nuclear power, the oil powers will become impoverished again, because they haven't used their wealth to improve the state of their people. Developing Iran's electrical system is their stated reason for developing nuclear technology, but the technology they are developing is substantially unnecessary for the nuclear power plants they are discussing.
The powerful nations are simply using the radical islamic politicians as pawns in the Great Game. When Islam becomes too inconvenient, the world will cause it to disappear, and the wealthy politicians who supported radical Islam will retire to a life of leisure and wealth. Unless Islam destroys itself first.
It sounds like you are a subject of bad propaganda. Have you any idea who the USA was helping to liberate in the Balkan Wars?
I wish you good luck before you embarass yourself further.
2006-08-06 05:57:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lewis Y 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not all americans follow the "Decider's" aka Mr. Bush's adgenda about who is correct and who is not. Some of us understand who sponsored the terrorists and who did not. Some of us understand that we attacked a country that did not ever attack us (Iraq) and are friends with a coutry that sponsored our attack with funding (Saudi Arabia). If we do not like the Iraq war Bush says we do not like Democracy. He tries to get us to think it is some humanitarian effort over there like the peace core. We know it is not all elections, bridges, clean water and schools. We know it is death on both sides and destruction. We are not stupid even Bushes friends are not that stupid. They are pretty stupid but most of them are not that stupid they know it is a war at least. They may think tons of other stupid things about the administration. Some of us are very disenchanted and scared by our government some are plain ignorant. Just do not think all Americans are living in blissful ignorance. Some of us are living in fear and worry. Some of us know the seriousness of the situation, but feel trapped and feel unsafe even by writing this in yahoo answers.
Not all americans are caught up in pop culture and distracted and happy in stupidity.
We are told if we do not like the politics of Condi Rice that we are racist. But if we like MLK are we racist? What if it is just Condi we do not like and it is not her race, but her politics? They say we must be racist. That is what the current administration says that is.
So there is no good or bad. Terrorism is bad and the muslim relgion at the very core is beautiful. Any religion Christianity especially can get horrible when it becomes fundamentalized and loses sight of the original teachings.
2006-08-06 05:38:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by adobeprincess 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
very good question,which brain dead americans should note.american policy is to keep democracy out of the middle east so they can control the oil.the us will support dictators who suppress the peoples rights.if power came into the hands of a real government...no more oil.
2006-08-06 05:27:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by mel gibson 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good Muslims = Exhibit A
Bad Muslims = Exhibit B
2006-08-06 07:17:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is no question, all muslims are bad. If they are muslim, they believe that they must convert the entire world to their beliefs. To me, that is bad when a religion can turn an entire population into a religion converting herd that must indoctrinate the world to its cause. Sounds pretty evil to me, and i have no religion, i am an atheist.
2006-08-06 05:35:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Unfortunately, Islam like Nazism is on the wrong side of history.
2006-08-06 05:30:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by zoomjet 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Edna Bambrick
2006-08-06 05:24:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The world t isn't about Democracy, it is about control over natural resources.(people, oil, etc)
2006-08-06 05:29:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by King Midas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋