Is Hovind's statement true? Yes and no.
Yes, because no one has actually seen a star's formation in its entirety.
No, because star formation actually takes a very...very...very long time. I believe it takes substantially longer than a human life span. Thus, while no one has ever seen one form in full - because it's impossible to do so - there have been many observations of the various stages of star formation.
It's like viewing various frames from a film, and using that information to figure out what happens in the film.
My advice: never take anything that Kent Hovind says seriously. Simply put, he's an idiot. He has no real education, and makes his living by catering to religious extremists. None of his claims about science are actually, totally true. They're essentialy just doublespeak and propaganda that play off the ignorance of the listener/reader.
2006-08-05 18:15:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by extton 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Well, we can't observe a star being formed in real time, because we're too far away from them. For example, it takes light from the sun 8 minutes to reach the Earth, so when you see the sun, you're actually seeing it as it was 8 minutes ago.
The same thing can be said for distant stars. A light year is the distance light travels in a year, so if you start hearing them use "light years away", that's what they mean.
For example, a star that's said to be 50 light years away means that when you see that starlight, that's how the star appeared 50 years ago. A star that's 1,000 light years away means that when you look at the star light, people were still living in the medieval era on Earth when the light first left the star.
We've "seen" a star being formed (I think the Pleiades in the Taurus constellation is a bunch of young stars), and we've also seen them "die" (supernova, although by the time the light reaches us, the star's been dead for thousands or even millions of years).
You should study astronomy, or cosmology if you want to learn more about this stuff.
2006-08-05 18:22:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by komodo_gold 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, no one has ever seen a star form. It's because that the formation of stars starts as hydrogen and helium molecular clouds change into a ball of plasma which is a star. This molecular formation is only known because of the wavelengths they emit. They cannot be seen optically.
2006-08-05 18:25:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by blitz2.0 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We already can word the leftover radiation from the super Bang. They call it the Cosmic historic past Radiation, and that they have mapped it in astounding element. the 1st action picture star is definitely extra durable to make certain, because of fact it is totally small, on the same time as the CBR covers the full sky. Plus, we don't understand the place the 1st action picture star formed. we can look returned and see stars because of fact the 1st ones have been forming billions of years in the past, yet for all all of us understand the 1st action picture star grew to become into plenty nearer, and the sunshine of it is dying reached us formerly.
2016-11-03 23:43:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
since the process takes millions of years, Technically no, no one has sat around and watch a star form, but stars forming have been discovered in many states of formation.
2006-08-05 18:21:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by alana banana 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would probably take a loooong time... and they'd have to be observing the whole universe at one time... and when they do see it, they probably wouldn't know it
2006-08-05 18:15:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by DeAd DiScO 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, here is a website about it.
2006-08-05 18:17:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by galactic_man_of_leisure 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I think they have.
2006-08-05 18:15:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by NA A 5
·
0⤊
0⤋