English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

UN previous resolutions, Israel history with UN, Suitability of resolution to all parts, hezbollah is to become lebanon broker for peace,

2006-08-05 17:09:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

5 answers

A UN resolution is cooking? So, that must be what that smell was ... it smelled like something was burning.

2006-08-05 19:56:56 · answer #1 · answered by Angela B 4 · 0 1

It won't be respected by Hezbollah any more than the last one was. What kind of idiot lets a terrorist organization that has repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel be the broker for peace between Israel and Lebanon the home of Hezbollah. The Un troops there now were supposed to see to it that Hezbollah was disarmed 6yrs ago and you see how well that worked. Hezbollah feels it wins if they are allowed to survive and that cowardly bearded leader has said so on the television. If Israel pulls out before destoying Hezbollah's leadership and it's capacity to wage war even if it's just lobing rockets into northern Israel Arabs will say they won just as Saddam Hussein did when we left him in power after the first Gulf War.

2006-08-06 00:32:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think Israel should tell the UN where to get off. How many times does Israel have to let the UN stick it to them before Israel has the right to say "we've tried your way enough, now we are going to do it our way"

Every time the UN sticks their nose into the Mid East and gets a cease fire out of the deal, the terrorist come back stronger each time. Is Israel supposed to keep playing this game until Iran, or one of the other terror sponsoring states has a nuclear weapon?

It's easy for the UN to sit back and play judge and jury but they have nothing at stake here. Or anywhere else for that matter. Name me a peace effort that the UN was ever involved in where they had control and responsibility and did any good? There isn't any. Hell the UN peacekeepers end up being the perpetrators of violent crimes (rape mostly) in those countries they are dispatched to and supposed to protect. What's with that?

If the United Nations were doing its job, they would have this president of Iran charged with the crime of threatening genocide. It is against international laws for him to be spouting off about wiping Israel off the map.

The UN is a spineless, corrupt organization whose time has come. There should be investigations into their actions, and lack of results with punitive measures put into place.

The Oil for Food program was proven to be so corrupt with Annans son raking off millions of dollars for his own pockets, and no one dares follow through holding him accountable.

Israel should put together a list of counter demands and when the UN demands a ceasefire, inform them that the battle will stop when you deal with these issues. For starters Yasser Arafat hid behind the UN for decades all the while being one of the major terror sponsers in the world and the UN just smiled when Arafat winked. Say one thing and do what ever he pleased to Israel.

No, the UN should keep their inept noses out of the Mid East if for no other reason then they have proven over time they don't know what they are doing over there. They have yet to achieve peace in the region or these battles would not keep coming up.

2006-08-06 01:40:45 · answer #3 · answered by scubadiver50704 4 · 0 0

Will it matter to either party No , there going to keep on doing what there doing ,the only thing that will change is the intensity of the war

2006-08-06 00:14:58 · answer #4 · answered by Fatwa Freddie 3 · 0 0

Huh?????

2006-08-06 00:13:09 · answer #5 · answered by homerunhitter 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers