Would liberals gladly convert to Islam if forced?

Question

Appeasement didn't work during WWII, and it sure won't with the fascists in the Middle East that would gladly give their life up to blow up a blue, YES, a BLUE LIBERAL city.

Would you gladly convert to Islam if forced, liberals? Why is your solution only appeasement toward Islamofascists? Is it cowardice running through your French veins?

It's an honest question since you think saying the pledge of allegiance with "under God" is forced religion. Got your prayer rug and burkha, liberals?

Sean D, quit posing as a republican. People can research your answers and clearly see you are a LIBTARD/

Look at the nazi lib azaab at the bottom. My point is well proven.

Answer 1

All the liberals I know would . I live in Sf and on the other side of the golden gate bridge is mill valley home of pastey face peace creep liberals and American Taliban John Walker Lindh .
Is this a co- incidence I think not

Answer 2

I have YET to hear anyone say that we should appease Islam.

However, I have yet to hear you say that you understand that Islam is
not one monolithic religion or people. Your attitude seems to be that
United States military can solve this problem despite the best evidence
is completely to the contrary.

You complain about liberals and their attitudes - but has this held the
President back? Has he been unable to do anything he wants there
because of us commie liberals? Please remember that all 3 houses
of the government are currently held by conservatives before you
answer that.

No ... the current situation is due to the President's ineptitude dealing
with a situation that is far more complicated than he can get his little
brain around.

Also please note that with the last littany of terrorist activies you listed,
there were less than 10000 people killed all told - far less than what flu kills
every year in this country.

Why are we spending our money fighting a war that we can't win short
of killing everyone there, when we could be saving an order of magnitude
of people more investing that money in research? Just think what 200
billion would have bought in medical research.

We are misallocating our money because we are reacting out of fear.
We are all going to die, but people are now so scared of terrorists that
they are completely not funding methods of preventing far more effective
ways of preventing death.

Indeed, our current activity isn't preventing death - it is causing more of it.

Don't get me wrong - I'd love to be able to find all of the terrorists out
there and put them some place where they can't harm me - but it cannot
happen because that's not the way terrorism works.

By Bush's definition of a war - this war will NEVER be over, and it was
certainly not declared at 9/11 - it has been going on since man kind
ever picked up a rock and through it at another man.

I am not willing to give up my civil liberties because Bush can't
read a history book or talk to other people who have fought wars
in the Middle East.

Even you must realize that the insurgency in Iraq cannot be
eliminated purely through military might. Indeed, all we seem to do
by trying is to create MORE of it. The longer we're there, the more
there is of it.

I'm sorry that terrorism isn't an enemy that lines up in nice straight
lines on the hillside that can be mowed down with a single machine
gun... that's not the way war works any more. I don't understand
how the leader of the free world can possibly be thinking with
with revolutionary war tactics since Vietnam so clearly proved that
a well entrenched guerilla group can ultimately out wait any
opponent that isn't willing to nuke the whole neighborhood.

The vast majority of Islamic peoples are as peaceful if not more
peaceful than Christian countries. They certainly have lower
crime rates.

I believe that the correct response to 9/11 would have been to
1: Take out the Taliban
2: Properly fund and augment our troops in Afghanastan rather
than leave them short shifted
3: Not go to Iraq as we did not have compelling evidence of WMDs.
4: Improve security around our infrastructure (airports, etc)
5: Work with other countries to continually offer democratic solutions
to these non-democratic states where many of these terrorists
originated.
6: Pursue the individuals thought to be involved and try them.
7: Have a well publicized debate in the Congress about which
civil liberties we need to give up and why in order to reduce the
likelihood of another event like 9/11 happening.
8: Teach people the real STATISTICAL meaning of 9/11.

It was a tragedy - we should learn from it - not turn it into more of
a tragedy.

Answer 3

u cant be 'forced' to be a muslim. its not accepted in islam if ur forced and then just being a hypocrite about it.

so dont get things wrong. u either want to be a muslim voluntarily or u dont. its the choice of the individual according to islam.

(and its also the choice of the individual if they want to wear burkha's or not. its required for females to be modest and cover up but no one can force you. it says that in the Qur'an so go read about the religion before u make yourself look stupid)

anyway the burkha is a cultural costume. if u ever travelled around the world (i think u should to broaden your mind) you will see that different muslim regions have different costumes. some can be very colourful and pretty. they just all abide to the islamic female dress code where everything is covered except the hands and face. its to be modest. dont u understand? and yes the face need not be covered. like i said, its regional costume thats inherited from the culture of the region.

Answer 4

Islam is not for me. I am a free thinking individual. Frankly, I am not that much against the Republican idealisms, but I do have a problem with politicians masquerading as Conservatives who think they have fooled the "stupid" people into believing they are being represented in a fair manner. One close look at the oil industry's hold on power and how can anyone say they are proud to be a member of that party?

Answer 5

Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Original Liberal, led the country during WWII with a Liberal Democratic congress and WE WON that war you dolt! I will not "convert" to ANY religion and really wish all you RELIGO-NAZIS would kill each other and get out of the way of human progress.

In other words take your God and shove it! Tards like you are ruining the country and the world.

Answer 6

Again I'm not normally into name calling but you an Idiot, No I wouldn't let someone force me to convert. And what do you have against French people? is because they wont bow down and kiss the feet of your God, George Bush. I'm willing to bet the French and John Kerry are both braver than you are. And I see you still haven't gotten that help I suggested!!!

Answer 7

liberals converting to Fascist , backward Islam it strikes me as oxymoronic. But some of those "progressive clowns have taken that retroactive step. Fools (that includes a lot of socialists and National Public Radio. Go figure.
I would sooner die than take up that backward, misogynist, abominable, heartless, homicidal, 9/11, religion.
Dan.

Answer 8

Sometimes i wonder,

if your acting the fool, or really are a fool.

for example........
when you make these attacks based on Islam,
i wonder if you really think your offending anyone,

wonder if your world view is really that limted, where all Muslims are evil and that poliitcally it is insulting to associate a religion with a political party.
as if that was the best insult you could come up with.

that is either lazy or sad.

keep um coming, i get two points for pointing out the uselessness of your questions and mental shortcomings of thier author.

Answer 9

Hmm. I see we have some raging hostility going.

Oh, I see, name calling is good debate strategy. Arguing from absurdity, well, I think there are some Ayatollahs and Bible thumpers that could lend some guidance. Perhaps, instead, a simple Zeig Heil would make you happy. (LOL, I don't even care how to spell that one.)

Blue state liberal, here, and damn proud of it.

Answer 10

Nope. Not this Liberal Democrat. Being Liberal doesn't mean siding with terrorists.

You've been listening to Rush-oriley-Hannity too long. Couldn't quite work Coulter into that...but she's too much of a freak to listen to whether your red or blue.