English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is part 2 to a previous question.

If there is no defendable reason, to use voting machines that do not give receipts, or receipts that can be recounted by hand........

Then should you trust the votes produced by those machines?






Part 1.was........
Can you defend and give me a few reasons that states should use voting machines that do not produce a paper receipt or a receipt recountable by hand?

thats all, thanks.

2006-08-05 16:52:19 · 4 answers · asked by nefariousx 6 in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

Good question. All voting machines , should give some type of chit, receipt or record of the vote. It should also have a control # or serial # on the receipt.

2006-08-05 17:20:04 · answer #1 · answered by biz owner 3 · 1 0

Once again, I know I read legislation somewhere that paper receipts were going to be required with electronic voting machines. Congress must have changed this.

2006-08-07 14:51:56 · answer #2 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1 0

Your logiv is fallable because those machines are created by humans and thus imperfect. Humans are imperfect. Therefore humasn are incapable or casting a perfect, just vote. DEAL WITH IT;

2006-08-05 23:57:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

So you're saying just be a weenie and sit home and cry about it?

I say fight back, never surrender !

2006-08-06 00:10:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers