English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WMD's have been found. Are liberals to busy hugging trees and talking to bin laden to notice wmd's have been found?

2006-08-05 15:32:45 · 31 answers · asked by Ah Ha 3 in Politics & Government Politics

31 answers

they're too busy screwing one another

2006-08-05 15:36:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The WMD's that Sen. Santorum was talking about on Hannity and Colmes were first reported in a Iraqi Survey Group report. This came out in Oct. 2004. It stated that they had found 500 chemical artillery shells that had been buried before the first Gulf War.They were so degraded the worst they could do was give you a sore throat. You know if these were the WMD's the Bush Administration invaded Iraq for, they'd be shouting it from the roof of the White House. Santorum is playing the fear card because he is in a fight for his Senate seat.

2006-08-06 02:42:00 · answer #2 · answered by ggarsk 3 · 0 0

WMD's were never found in Iraq, what you are refering to was some left over weapons that were degraded beyond any use. The were some of the weapons that Reagan sold to Iraq prior to 1988. The U.N. weapons inspectors reported these very weapons at or about 1998. Why do you lie to cover up for the worst president this country has ever seen.

2006-08-05 22:40:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why in God's name, you filthy conservative, are you so interested in making Americans look bad? Imagine what Arabs think when they see us.

Here's what we've done so far.

-Our previous leaders supplied Iraq with weapons and arms.

-We are attacked by the military idealist group Al Qaeda.

-We invade Afghanistan, killing thousands of innocents.

-We successfully take over and go immediately into another war with an Arab country over unproven claims that were being investigated. Our "Coalition of the Willing" consisted of Britain and a number of third-world countries with no army, and guess what! Afghanistan! We were not supported by the UN.

-We take over and THERE WERE NO NUCLEAR BOMBS! If there were, I would reconsider. Where do you get your news, the "Conservative Wish List"? The war suddenly had nothing to do with "WMDs", but was about "freedom in Iraq". How many trillions of dollars is that worth?

-Iraq goes into a period of civil unrest, such as a CIVIL WAR.

And that's not all of it. If you're really such a patriot, talk about how stupid our enemies are, not how unpatriotic your fellow Americans are. Now go be a conservative and be ignorant for the good of your country. What are you conserving, anyway? And don't say "values" like your oh so great Bush, leader of the "free" world.

2006-08-05 23:11:31 · answer #4 · answered by Elerth Morrow ™ 5 · 0 0

Yeah, a bunch of rusty old cannisters from before the first Gulf War that the Iraqis had likely lost themselves. They were useless as weapons when they were found and they were useless when we invaded.

You know why this story didn't get any traction outside of Fox News land? Because it's nothing--less than nothing.

Pointing this out just makes people look silly... arguing that we were justified in invading a country because they had what amounts to some low-grade toxic waste lying around. The fact that this was released in an attempt to justify the war just shows how desperate Bush and freinds are to try and make it look legit.

2006-08-06 21:41:23 · answer #5 · answered by Song M 2 · 0 0

What do you mean Liberals? I have not seen this report about WMD's on any reputable new source. I have not even heard Rush talk about it.

If we really found weapons in Iraq, this would not be hard information to find. George Bush and Dick Cheany would be on every news program on every channel every day saying "See!! We were right all along!" But they aren't. Why do you suppose that is?

2006-08-05 23:17:21 · answer #6 · answered by arvis3 4 · 0 0

Yep, WMDs have been found, and they're out of date. Their shelf life has long past. No good. Like firecrackers. It's a half-truth, anyway. And by the way, liberals have the best music.

2006-08-05 22:37:24 · answer #7 · answered by tiko 4 · 0 0

The real question is, Why are conservatives, Republicans, "neocons" and right-wing chickenhawks too stupid to see the truth. We have a poorly planned war that is costing us and the Iraqi people many lives, billions we can't afford and to top it off this administration has spent us into record deficits, eroded our environmental laws and put the bottom line of big business before the American people.

People who voted for Bush should be ashamed of themselves and I see them as a threat to the American way of life.

2006-08-05 23:09:12 · answer #8 · answered by sohrob76 2 · 0 0

That's a ridiculous statement. We found weapons, which by the way were given to Iraq by the US in the Reagan era, that were degraded so badly that they couldn't be used. Go ahead and put your spin on it. Yeah, we found weapons. But they weren't the weapons we were looking for. They were weapons that we knew they had. I guess now the war has been justified. You make me sad.

2006-08-05 22:49:25 · answer #9 · answered by rob 3 · 0 0

Who cares? The point is they weren't found when we went to Iraq and for some reason we went anyway. And really, isn't finding Osama more important than little old Saddam? Why hasn't Osama been captured yet? Are the rumors about he and Bush being pals true?

2006-08-05 22:36:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Liberalism is not based upon an investigation of the facts. Liberals decide issues based on emotion. Liberals know their emotions, so there is no reason to spend time looking at the facts. It is all how the feel, not how they think.

2006-08-05 22:45:42 · answer #11 · answered by bird_brain_88 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers