Does anyone out there actually think for a moment that, "Hillary 'Lightening Rod' Left Wing-Liberal-ACLU-Lover, Queen of Mean-Solutionless-Cover Up for Slick Willy's Sexploits Clinton", could seriously debate a giant of man such as Rudy Giuliani for the higest office of the land!?
Some might forget while Hillary defended Bobby Seale the Black-Panther anarchist for murdering a "snitch" Rudy Giuliana broke the back of organized crime and went on to reduce crime in NYC by 76% in his first term. He cleaned up the horror of the Black Democratic Mayor Dinkins adminstration, who was accused of actually taking furniture out of Gracie Mansion after his term was up!
The whole News media is licking their lips at the prospect of a
Hillary vs Giuliani match in '08 !!!
Many would like to see a woman as President BUT she ain't it!
What say you?
2006-08-05 15:28:24 · 27 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
As far as her debate skills go, she was listed as one of the countries top 100 lawyers. I imagine she could hold her own and then some.
Is she too devisive? No more than W is. Although he claimed to be a uniter.
Giuliani had the affair with his mistress while in office, and he is pro choice. There is no way the religious right will allow him on the ticket. And face it, if the right doesn't turn out to vote, the Republicans loose. W knew that, he saw what happened to his dad. That's why he panders to them now.
The news media is too lazy to lick there lips. They will just keep reporting what the story of the day is.
Mark my words, the ticket in 2008 will be...
2006-08-13 14:30:54 · answer #1 · answered by Steve R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you look into Giuliani's past, he's no clean slate either. Take a look at HIS wonderful marriage scandal.
Giuliani's practically a democrat (just like Schwarzenegger) by the current "stolen by the conservatives" Republican party, which means he probably can't win the nomination. Makes it unlikely for McCain too. Both McCain and Giuliani would have an easier time getting the Democratic nomination.
Gore will likely get the Dem nomination, not Hillary; and the Republicans will likely nominate some nut like Frist or Santorum. I'd bet they nominate Delay if they still had the chance. All this leads to a Dem victory.
2006-08-10 05:05:48 · answer #2 · answered by Composer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Giuliani would make a interesting opponent. McCain may have a say in it though. Along with bored with Gore. Hillary has enough negatives that most thinking people will vote for her opponent. If you look at the last four or five elections it almost seems like it is rigged. With the exception of GW and Gorski most have been very one sided. Why do you think Hillary did not run in 04 or the Dems did not try to win. If another Dem won she would have had to wait eight more years. Its going to run down party lines and the few people left will be bullied harassed to vote for the candidate that person is backing. You can bet you a$$ there will be plenty of Bush bashing going on!
2006-08-05 22:59:40 · answer #3 · answered by iamwelndowd1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't care if the president is a man or woman. I agreed that Hillary Clinton is the wrong choice for President. Also, I wouldn't vote for Rudy Giuliani either.
2006-08-13 07:49:21 · answer #4 · answered by Redknight 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like when people ask questions like this, because it's interesting to read the different responses.
As for your question, I really dont know anymore whom to vote for when presidential elections come around.
The candiates say things pre-election, so you vote for a candiate based on these reasons. But I feel that once this person gets elected they tend to run the govenment according to their own agenda. I feel a little let down when this happens
As for Hillary Clinton or Rudy Giuliani for president?? I would like to know what they say they would for the country before I made a decision. As for your question...Why did you pick Rudy Giuliani as her competitor when it seems that you want to know if we are ready for a woman president?? Why didnt you pick another female candidate?
2006-08-13 10:04:57 · answer #5 · answered by kimberleibenton 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see Hillary winning the nomination, but Rudy can't either. He's got too many skeletons in his closet, including something similar to the circumstances surrounding the formers' husband. Rudy doesn't have a chance.
2006-08-05 22:35:06 · answer #6 · answered by swede700 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK, I'm really scared now.....I don't think either of these individuals are strong enough to take command of the Presidency during the current state of the world. I don't know where we are going to find a strong candidate but I hope one shows soon. Hillary - plzzzzzzz.
2006-08-12 05:46:21 · answer #7 · answered by historybuff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary would mop the floor with Rudy. Guess you want the Democrats to win don't you? Good for you!
2006-08-06 00:07:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
damn I thouht you freaks were all about family values, hillary stuck by her man as the whole world watched. you seriously think she covered up her husbands affair or did that come out of rush's butt into your ear? I agree with sharon stone, hillary has too much sexual power to run right now. she will be the first woman pres. but not in 08.
2006-08-11 17:03:34 · answer #9 · answered by sharillo76 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
she cant be running for the presidency if she is facing another democrat!
she might be running to be the democratic candidate for the presidency , but she will never win that.
it is possible you might see her run third in this democratic race, and then be selected as the vice presidential candidate , but guliano wont be making the selection.
some bright new candidate from one of the new england states will , if there is one available.
peace
2006-08-05 23:02:03 · answer #10 · answered by thad t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋