English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

who is worse : NEOKON Bush or Adolf Hitler ?

2006-08-05 14:45:04 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

40 answers

Neither. The people who support them. Or those who are too apathetic to do anything to stop them would be the worse.

2006-08-05 14:49:38 · answer #1 · answered by fraser_68 2 · 0 0

Adolf Hitler

2006-08-05 14:47:30 · answer #2 · answered by jennifer c 1 · 0 0

Adolf started with great ideas. I admit what he did was wrong; but bush has never had a good idea for the good of his people or other wise anything else. Hitler truly felt what he was doing would help his people form totally be in a world of s$#%, bush doesn't care about use and he's too busy cushioning his own pockets. Plus during the same time frame Stolen killed off more people than Hitler; but since he was on the side of the winners he's not thought of as bad of a guy. Killing people is wrong and many have done so with good intentions and to gain power

2006-08-05 14:56:18 · answer #3 · answered by Cbear 2 · 0 0

When "Pres Chimps Brothers" recently sought out the help of a therapist, it was no mystery as to what was ailing them. The 27-year-old copy editors were so consumed by their belief that President George W. Bush stole the 2004 election that they were having trouble sleeping, completing rudimentary tasks at work, and carrying on conversations about topics not related to politics.

The therapist they consulted wrote the Chimp Family a prescription for the social anxiety drug Paxil and encouraged them to spend less time reading left-wing Web logs and listening to Air America.

This particular story has a happy ending; The Chimp Brothers admit that they are far less irritating to be around than they were just a few weeks ago. But countless paranoids just like them may be going untreated, say mental health professionals.

And now they think Bush masterminded 9/11

2006-08-05 14:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by Heroic Liberal 1 · 0 0

adolf hitler killed 12 million Jews, catholics, and Polish. and also started a world war.

Bush made poor leadership desicions, started some wars that had nothing to do with 9/11, lied about certain weapons, supposedly faked 2 electoins, but didnt commit genocide.

and genocide covers all the other stuff in evil rock paper sissors.

i think its pretty obivious Hitler is worse, and if you can't see that, u need some serious help.

2006-08-09 04:01:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Adolf Hitler of course.I don't like Bush and would like to see him go but he doesn't come close.
Bush has started one illegal war but not to dominate the whole world.
Bush does not advocate genocide,he probably can't even pronounce the word.
Frankly I think your question is offensive and wrong.Bush is a very bad politician and president in my opinion but he is not the greatest criminal in human History.Using symbols like this too much lessens their importance and that makes it ,more easy for real fascists in the future.

2006-08-05 14:55:00 · answer #6 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0 0

Okay it's obvious you don't like Bush. But this comparison is absurd. If you have any solid reasons that Bush is even in the same league as Hitler then go ahead, but before then don't be a jerk. You can have your opinions but this is just hateful.

2006-08-05 14:49:17 · answer #7 · answered by Tiffany C 5 · 0 0

of course adolf hitler. he killed so many people just because he doesn't like them. as for bush, i do feel like he's trying, but he's just got a combo of bad luck and not enough ability. all the conflicts he's dealing with are just stuff that's been building up since 30 years ago. they've been like a huge pimple on the butt of humanity waiting to erupt.

2006-08-05 14:49:00 · answer #8 · answered by nickname 3 · 0 0

Hitler: mass murderer of 6 million Jews
Bush: mass murderer of thousands of Arabs...and still counting! There's still potential!

Hitler: lied to an entire country about what he was actually up to
Bush: lying to an entire country about what he has been up to

Hitler: supported by his entire country
Bush: stole an election...not supported by his countrymen or women

Hmmm....strikingly similar. At least Hitler's dead and can't hurt anyone anymore....unfortunately Bush is still here and wreaking havoc

2006-08-05 14:58:53 · answer #9 · answered by bitto luv 4 · 0 0

Hitler is dead, so he currently isn't causing any bloodshed. Bush is presently on a killing spree in the Mid-East. Hitler, also, may not have been as big a thief and liar as Bush.

2006-08-05 14:50:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

At this point in time Hitler but give Bush a chance and he may pass Hitler.We wont give him that chance.

2006-08-05 14:50:56 · answer #11 · answered by Mom 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers