I Totally Agree!.. It's None of Our Business and We need to Stay out of it.
2006-08-05 14:30:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by M L 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
As to why they are going to be placed in eastern Europe....i do no longer understand. I wasn't invited to that communicate. Russia shouldn't experience threatened by using one among those device with the aid of fact that's incapable of effectively protecting against the style of missile barrage that the Russians are able to turning in. that's designed around a small scale attack (perhaps some missiles). Such assaults are lots greater in all likelihood to originate from rogue/militant businesses (ie terrorists). Russia's rhetoric is in accordance with worry of being bumped off the soundness of ability sooner or later. they seem to think of they have some thing we'd decide for. From what i've got seen, there's no longer something there (different than in all likelihood some circumstances of vodka) that could interest the U. S. or our allies. The chilly warfare is over. there's no logical reason of a strike against the Russians. A missile protection device does not "factor east" as you describe. Missiles must be centred and could be reported to point a undeniable path. A missile protection device is shielding in nature and as such scans the sky in all instructions to discover any attainable threats. in the event that they have been "pointed" in a undeniable path, they could in basic terms shelter against assaults from that path because there does no longer be time to re-objective them throughout a missile attack. additionally, I heavily doubt that eastern Europe is the only place the device would be placed.
2016-10-01 12:42:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did Israel deliberately allow 241 American Marines to die?
Yes, says Victor Ostrovsky, a former Israeli secret agent. In a new book, By Way of Deception: A Devastating Insider's Portrait of the Mossad, Mr. Ostrovsky says the Israelis had advance notice of the suicide attack that killed 241 Marines in Beirut in October 1983 but withheld the information from the United States in the hope that the attack would poison American Arab relations.
The Israeli government is desperately trying to block publication of the book, which also says the Israelis are "actively spying, recruiting, organizing and carrying out covert activities mainly in New York and Washington, which they refer to as their playground."
Although it can hardly succeed and will probably back fire, the censorship attempt enjoyed initial success in both the U.S. and Canada. Obliging courts in both countries have ordered that the book be at least temporarily suppressed When it comes to Israel, freedom of speech and of the press is considerably less than total, even in America.
Mr. Ostrovsky says Israeli agents heard he had written the book and tried to bribe and threaten him to dissuade him from going into print. He is now in hiding.
More than 17,000 copies of By Way of Deception are in print, and many reviewers have already received copies. If the book divulges sensitive information, as the Israelis' lawyers say, it's too late to stop other governments from getting it. The only purpose of the censorship is to stop Americans from reading Mr. Ostrovsky's account of how Israel allowed U.S. Marines to be slaughtered
Books are rarely suppressed in America (at least not by direct government intervention), and by the time you read this, By Way of Deception will almost certainly be unshackled. Then the Israelis will have to either discredit the author or argue, as they did in the case of the spy Jonathan Pollard, that the decision to let the Marines be killed was a "rogue" action.
Mr. Ostrovsky's allegations should be shocking. Letting the troops of a benefactor nation be blown up in their own compound is hardly the act of a "reliable ally," as Israel is said to be.
But you have to wonder whether anyone will really be shocked. The act would be consistent with a long pattern of reprehensible Israeli behavior toward the U.S. Some of it has been widely publicized; no doubt the largest part of it has never been discovered.
If anyone ought to be stunned, it's the many pundits who echo Israeli propaganda to the effect that Israel is America's only valuable and trustworthy ally in the Middle East. If they mean what they say, they should be publicly changing their minds, or at least demanding a thorough investigation into Israeli conduct toward this country.
Congress ought to be shocked, too, to the extent that its all-out support for Israel has been sincere rather than venal and cowardly. But how many of our elected representatives will dare, or care, to ask tough questions about whether our ties to Israel have done serious damage to this country's interests?
Such questions are not only long overdue, they are especially urgent right now, when the United States may be on the verge of a full-scale war in the Middle East, and the Israel lobby is eager to see America launch hostilities against Israel's chief enemy, Iraq.
The path of least resistance is to say nothing, to go on pretending that the interests of the U.S. and of Israel are virtually identical, to keep repeating that Israel is our "reliable ally" and "strategic asset." Any politician or journalist who says otherwise, even for the good of America, does so at risk to his career. That's why there is so little open debate on these matters. Even our press isn't fully free.
And now the Israeli government has mounted a direct attack on press freedom in America itself. It will be instructive to see whether the press corps goes on acting unshocked.
well pictures speak louder than words and this article was to the musicman !so do not listen to such brainwashed peps ! they r brianwashed by their media ! and ask urself why don't you see those things on ur media ? ha coz they r biased channels Like "Fox" now jst take a look !
2006-08-05 14:38:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rei! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The motto of the Hezbolla is "Death to the Americans" always has been. That doesn't mean unless we are nice to them, that doesn't mean unless we sit down and talk and hug them. It means they want us dead and they are doing it in the name of their God. You people keep forgetting who started all of this.
Truck bomb, US Marine barracks, Lebanon
boat bomb, USS Cole, Yemen
WTC, failed bomb, New York City
PanAm flight, Lockerbee Scotland
2 US embassies in Africa
3000 dead, WTC NYC September 11, 2001
It's payback time mofo's if you can't take it, don't dish it out.
2006-08-05 14:39:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by sparkletina 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
because bush wants to be the one to send the world into 1,000 years of darkness after a nuclear war and I believe he's waiting until the end of his term to push the button.
2006-08-05 14:31:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Topher 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
we can't we wan't our thumbs in everything and plus if the US and Europe left the Middle East alone Isreal would be gone in Six months.
2006-08-05 14:30:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Legal Eagle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
by installing democracies in the middle east, the u.s. ascertains that it has allies in that oil-filled region.
also, the u.s. needs to at least stay consistent in its foreign affairs.
its current prescence in the middle east binds them to the current crisis, because they said they went in there to restore peace.
2006-08-05 14:33:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by right. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the Muslims want to kill us too. We're not Muslims.
2006-08-05 14:34:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by on my way 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
And the best part is now the US and France have agreed upon a mideast ceasefire between hezbollah(Lebanon) and Isreal
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14201487/
Am i missing something?
2006-08-05 14:36:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by sdo4tnr 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cause we need their oil. We're addicted to oil. We want their oil. We have to have their oil. We will fight for their oil. Don jew no dat?
2006-08-05 14:34:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋