The world would look like it does now. There is a saying I heard once and liked it.."Behind every strong man there is a woman." Look at most political families, the women these days instead of parading around in dresses are wearing either dress suites or pants suites. The greatest advisors any man/woman has is their partner.
2006-08-07 13:45:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't know but I'd really like to find out. I REALLY WANT TO KNOW!!!!!
LOL!
So ladies, if you can think of how to get into rulling the world, let me know what I can do to help... then no matter what it's like WE'LL ALL KNOW- (if it's bad we'll know it's just people vs. men or women), and if it's BETTER well...
HECK YEAH !
I sure want to be on the earth if it happens again; women have ruled and run societies before (druidic and oracle cultures; Ancient Gaul, Persia, Africa, Greece, Egypt, etc),
-and women can again...
I think the problem is, generally (and many will see me as betraying my gender- LOL!) generally MOST women are too smart to WANT to get into running things or the politics of it.
Maybe that is why they are NOT in office vs. not being allowed. I mean who would WANT to????
Maybe NOT ruling is a more evolved way?
LOL!
*wink*
but when y'all are ready, I'd probably vote ya into running things- as long as you were going to to good things and stuck by what you said, same as anyone else.
2006-08-06 21:37:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by PsychStudent 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
everything would be awash in pink. There would be health care for everyone and more welfare programs, since women are the ones who raise the families, generally. There would be paid time off for pregnancy leave, for both men and women. Childcare would be available at work for everyone. There would be less war and nations would be lead by groups of women instead of one man. There would be less rape, and more love. Women would dress the way that they want, and not how men like us to dress. Children would be named Susie Jr. instead of John Jr. Life would be more family oriented.
2006-08-05 12:49:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by lost in translation 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peaceful. Most of the distress/war/violence in the world is perpetrated by men. Which is not an excuse to throw stones at them -- but I think it's the truth.
I think women are nurturers by nature.
2006-08-05 12:50:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by lakeofthelongsun 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
sure, some stable adult males are females.... yet as quickly as we base the argument on the bible, little doubt that adult males is the ruling intercourse. in simple terms the comparable additionally that for the time of a society it quite is in keeping with male-dominance lifestyle, we are able to assert that adult males policies the international. however the international is quickly changing, females now are slowly gaining skill and admire to be a co-equivalent ruler of the international... to boot, we call our usa a motherland and the international a mom earth.
2016-12-11 07:34:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by idaline 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
who said only men r ruling this world ? haven't u heard the proverb " behind every successful man there is a woman "
2006-08-12 05:40:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
About the same... women are no better than men and in some cases worse.
2006-08-05 12:55:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by curiousandsmiley 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they were along the vein of a Margrett Thatcher or Condi Rice, I wouldn't mind giving it a go.
2006-08-05 12:51:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by William F 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
There would be lots and lots of pretty shiny things. We would all be in touch with our feelings and in touch with the feelings of all people. There would be no wars, no hunger and no mismatched outfits.
2006-08-05 12:54:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by roadiemeeko 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
everyone would be dressed in frilly pink clothing including the armies, but the world would smell nicer^_^
2006-08-05 12:50:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by ralahinn1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋