is sex really any different at all depending if the guy is circumcised or not? Which way is better?
2006-08-05 08:56:55 · 9 answers · asked by amber k 1 in Health ➔ Women's Health
No that shouldn't matter - though I have never been with a guy who wasn't circumcised. It's just a flap of skin over the head - It wouldn't make sense - uncircumcised guys are more prone to bacteria, etc so they have to make sure that area is clean - it can collect stuff - neither is better or worse - 60% of men are circumcised and I prefer that - I think most women do.Why would a flap of skin matter to an orgasm or anything else?? It wouldn't.
2006-08-05 09:00:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not really.
In an erect state, the foreskin is anyway retracted even in uncircumcised men.
The only difference is that the sensitivity of the glans is lesser in circumcised men due to the constant friction of clothing which may delay orgasm. This is a highly individual thing and the time to orgasm has a million factors determining it.
2006-08-05 09:03:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's not really any different, in my experience anyway. I've been with one guy who wasn't circumcised and it didn't feel any better or worse than a guy who is circumcised.
2006-08-05 09:02:35 · answer #3 · answered by ♥BlackGirlLost♥ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not know but most men in the US are circumcised, and I do not think I would like it any other way.
2006-08-05 09:04:26 · answer #4 · answered by ♥Sunflower 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends upon the size of his wallet.
2006-08-05 08:58:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ed z is right
2006-08-05 09:00:13 · answer #6 · answered by WORDZ 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats a personal thing entirely up to you.
2006-08-05 09:01:16 · answer #7 · answered by vanessa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really, it's just the look of it.... (little more skin on it).
2006-08-05 09:01:57 · answer #8 · answered by Sunny 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im a guy
2006-08-05 09:01:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋