English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Being an insider in the field, I'm coming to terms with the fact that the behavioral sciences don't understand the very problems they're attempting to resolve...They only think they understand.

2006-08-05 08:11:26 · 10 answers · asked by Archetypal 3 in Social Science Psychology

10 answers

Nope, it's a guessing game.

2006-08-05 08:16:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have a BA in psych and think I know what you mean.
But...you have to remember this is a very broad field and there is a LOT to learn...we are learning more and more about how the mind in correlation with behavior but of course there is a lot more to learn. Just because we have learned something, but not everything, doesn't mean we know nothing.
Just think about what life would be like without the social science achievements. Perfectly normal behaviors would still be thought to be deviant or crazy. Women enjoying sex or being gay for example-thank god for the social sciences!

2006-08-05 08:35:38 · answer #2 · answered by sofun 4 · 1 0

It is a science, yes, but...an inexact one. The whole basis for the field is trends. That means that 2+2 doesn't ALWAYS equal 4, but...it usually does. So if you want to be at four, and you have 2 to start with, the first thing we can do to help you is to try adding two. If that doesn't work, we've got other stuff we can try (multiplying by two, for example, or squaring). So...yes and no.

2006-08-05 15:51:52 · answer #3 · answered by Atropis 5 · 0 0

As every mind is unique it would require studying the depth of each mind and when studied many minds you will find all seek similar things yet have many different paths to the others. Each mind is as complexed as the universal mysteries that baffles us as a whole so how can we make a assumption on the mind as a whole, we can only do that as the individual.

We all hold the same key to the same doors it's just the passageways that differ

2006-08-05 08:21:21 · answer #4 · answered by WW 5 · 0 0

No, absolutely not. it's only the experimental guessing. So many permittation & combination works at,on,in human mind, keeps varying every moment, hence probably it's the only impossible study in the field of Educational Science, my personal view exclusively.

2006-08-05 08:31:42 · answer #5 · answered by JD 4 · 0 0

particularly? The Luminous potential container has been shown by ability of technology has it? EMR on the different hand is in basic terms a by ability of-made of utilising electrical energy, which our physique does. EDIT: you have positioned the poultry till now the egg. our bodies use electrical energy for neural impulse transmission, this creates an electromagnetic container. This dissipates because of fact we are ineffective.

2016-11-03 23:08:11 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No I don't think they understand. I think it is one of the biggest guessing games you can get a degree for.

2006-08-05 08:18:27 · answer #7 · answered by up.tobat 5 · 0 0

No don't be silly but it does make for a plush cushy job

2006-08-05 09:52:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Everyone is different.

2006-08-05 08:32:56 · answer #9 · answered by XriZ 1 · 0 0

no they dont they think they do but they have no clue

2006-08-05 08:18:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers