Do u think it's more reasonable to believe in, "creation" over "evolution"?

Question

and why do you say so?

Answer 1

Nope...give me science any day.

Answer 2

Yeah. Reason means evolution. And I've answered this already. If things know how to GROW. Then why not long term grow (as in evolution)?

BTW, also eat this... if you are open minded enough to accept 'creationism' than you cud possibly accept that in the creation of new things by growth (aka evolution) that humans were "created" out of the clay (the base material of all organics) in growth (like a seed) that finally evolved to humans. The plus side? The growth process continues, so does evolution. Hopefully we all can guide it (with Gods help) into something even better still !!!!!!

Answer 3

It's not "reasonable" to believe in either one. The Creation story in Genesis is not history, but allegory. The only important words in the whole account are "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." The rest is pure filler.

And the theory of evolution as presented by Darwin is just as dubious. Though I can't elaborate due to my own lack of knowledge, he made several mistakes. Discoveries made in the generations since his work have pretty much refuted much of what he said, in spite of the blind embrace of Darwinism by many in the scientific community who see it as a bulwark against the fundamentalists who blindly embrace Creationism.

It doesn't have to be an either-or debate. God created the universe, to be sure, a fact even many scientists acknowledge. How He did it is not really important, and it's a question that will never fully be understood, just as God intended.

Answer 4

Since science changes views over time I think it would be illogical to say evolution is correct. Creationism has not changed in at least a couple more years than science has stuck with anything.

Answer 5

this is a very arguable err debatable question err topic

Creationism makes no sense to me.Its just a false "feel good that you are human,God's greatest creation" theory

Evolution is proved fact,if not fully then atleast partly.Human beings rule earth only because of evolution.Currently we are evolutions latest work.Some other species might evolve and take over the earth.Who knows what the future holds.

Answer 6

Actually, in my opinion it's unreasonable to not believe in both. There is too much evidence that evolution exists. There is also too much evidence that the two go hand in hand. Even scientists admit that the probability of life being "random" is ridiculously low. This is where the invisible force (Higher Power, Deity, God) comes in. For every masterpiece, there is an architect. The human body, in its pinnacle of health, is a masterpiece. Our DNA code is a masterpiece in itself.

Answer 7

In Evolution. Reasons are obvious.

Answer 8

The fact of creation has existed since the creation of mankind.Evolution only existed for about 200 years started by the theories of Darwin.And a bunch of bullsh*t stemmed from that.They are destroying the mysticism of THE GOD.And you wonder why people question HIS/HER/ITS existance.This is coming from a hanif-muslim.PEACE, LOVE,TRUTH As Salamun Alaikum

Answer 9

Well, its either both or none........... Because for Evolution to take place , there must be some creation in the first place which!!!

Answer 10

because I put no limits on God, I believe creationism and evolutionism happened concurrently....i.e. why couldn't God have dropped Adam & Eve right in the middle while around them evolution was also going on just as a new species?

Answer 11

both have good arguments on their side> I think we need both inorder to give us a full spectrom of our origins> In the end I believe that "creationism" and "evolution" are actually pseudo-science, because they involve alot of imagination and we can't really "observe" or "test" either theory> I think we need god (creationism) to explain our purpose and complexity, but we also need evolution (science) because it supports or explains all of biology (life)together>