2006-08-05 07:28:34 · 6 answers · asked by rayess00 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
your question is kind of redundant. I dont think that the US should occupy the world. at all. I think that would be dangerous is one nation had control over every other nation.
2006-08-05 07:36:39 · answer #1 · answered by Michelle H 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No it will not be a U.S. President who occupies the world and unites it under one world order......
It will be someone from Europe who will occupy the seat at the world government... he will unite the world under his management ....and those who do not accept him as world dictator will murdered by the thousands..
2006-08-05 08:06:13 · answer #2 · answered by General Custer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It'd be the downfall of the great USA if they do those two things. Not enough manpower and the military would be so stretched out badly. They'd be in debt. Not a good idea.
2006-08-05 07:41:14 · answer #3 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Niether
2006-08-05 07:35:42 · answer #4 · answered by scary g 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US wishes for the world to be free and peaceful. We need this to help them.
2006-08-05 08:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
either one will lead to armed insurrection and the downfall of the u.s. as a superpower. i wish the united states to fix the problems within it's own borders and leave other countries to fix theirs.
2006-08-05 07:36:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋