English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Books will never be completely replaced by computers. Computers can crash, and all information will be lost. If the power goes out in your house, you can't read on your computer, but you can pick up a book. What you read on a comp. is just light or something on a screen. A book is is a permentent physical printing. If computers replaced books, we'd all have serious eye problems. The joy of reading would be lost. I'd hate to have to depend on a machine for my relaxing reading time. Books are forever, computers are until it breaks down, and everything will be lost. Books can be taken care of, as can computers, but there are books that are a hundred years old, I haven't heard of anyone with the same computer for even 10 yrs. I guess comps are getting new and better, but books are still better to read. However, on the up side for comps, 1 comp, can store probebly over a hundred books, sort of like an i pod. But if the 1 comp breaks, that a hundred books too. Computers are good, and should store that kind of stuff, but I don't think it should completly replace the book. That would really suck. Reading is the #$%&.

2006-08-05 04:54:02 · answer #1 · answered by Rogi 2 · 5 0

For:

1. Publication would be cheaper, and therefore quicker and probably more likely.

2. Worldwide distribution would be simplified.

Against:

1. Finding good novels or non-fiction would be more difficult because of the volume of all kinds and qualities of same.

2. A computer, even a notebook, will never replace a pocket-sized paperback you can stick in a purse and read anywhere. Books don't need batteries, service, defragging or any of those things.

Like many aspiring authors, I'm excited by the possibilities posed by on-line publishing, but I have some serious reservations about what could happen if there is an unchecked volume of materials placed "out there."

Also, collecting royalties could make writing for profit even more of a challenge than it is today.

2006-08-05 04:19:54 · answer #2 · answered by Warren D 7 · 2 0

Books need neither battery nor a place where screen glare won't make reading a headache. There is also a tactile element - turning pages to find parts is more "real" as we are touching the book itself. This aids in retention of information. I can also just pick up a book and start reading - I have yet to have to wait for a copy of "The Scarlet Band" by Doyle to boot up.

But an electronic copy such as a PDF is FAR more portable - I can put several volumes of books onto a USB drive. And someone needs to do a study on the effect of manufacture of portable storage vs the manufacture of paper - which one causes less damage to the environment?

2006-08-05 04:17:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You can't haul your computer everywhere you go, like the bus, waiting rooms, the lunchroom, bed, etc. Too large, awkward and unwieldy. Even laptops. You can't just throw a laptop in your purse. I take books with me everywhere I go so I have something to kill the time with when I'm waiting. I read everyday on my lunch hour. I read before I go to bed. Sitting in front of a coputer to read makes my eyes, butt and back hurt, because you have to sit up to do it and the computer screen is too bright. Plus, books don't need batteries.

I think it's okay for kids in school, and I'm sure that there are other instances, but I highly doubt that books will ever become obsolete.

2006-08-05 04:17:12 · answer #4 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 2 1

If someone makes a computer that is truly comfortable to carry around and read in bed, it could happen.

But most readers enjoy the feel of a book - from reading an actual book instead of a screen.

It may come to pass that books will become obsolete due to the fact that they are made of paper and their storage requires more room, but I don't see it happening in the near future.

2006-08-05 04:20:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Can "computer" comprise different ability of digital analyzing, like Kindles? i will assume so :D For: convenience. 1000's of books on a single small gadget. it quite is fairly appropriate for those that shuttle or paintings lots, because of the fact it quite is greater complicated for them to hold books with them. against: e book enthusiasts. lots of people who like to verify are additionally e book enthusiasts, it quite is, they like the feel and scent of books, they like bodily being surrounded by using books. Kindles/books saved to a working laptop or computer for sure can not replace this. of direction this could be something which would be lost over the years if much less and much less books are revealed as not user-friendly-copies, yet for now. there are an excellent style of human beings for whom kindles can on no account replace "the genuine subject". in my view, i'm a e book lover and can on no account purchase a Kindle extremely of/to boot as actual books :)

2016-12-11 07:16:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

A computer can not be take wherever we what but a book can be taken any where we want .A book give some creative imaginary of a story when we read a story.And i also suggest read books they give us perfect speaking
skills and vocabulary.

2015-05-06 01:42:44 · answer #7 · answered by prasad 1 · 0 0

The computer will not replace the book. Can you curl up with a computer? The number of books will be reduced, perhaps, but the computer will never replace the book.

2006-08-05 04:22:38 · answer #8 · answered by mortilyn77 2 · 1 1

I can drop a book on the ground and pick it up and read it. I can even tuck it in my jacket pocket and take itwith me on a plane and read it without plugging it in or rechargeing it. I don't hav to look at a screen or operate a ouse or keyboard and I don't have to spend several hundred dollars on a book.
I will use my computer to order books and read them when they get here.

2006-08-05 04:15:56 · answer #9 · answered by Cattlemanbob 4 · 2 0

I seriously doubt it will replace it. Also the computer messes with the eyes very badly.

2006-08-05 04:20:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers