Personally, I think I belong lounging by the pool w/a martini in my hand.
2006-08-05 04:27:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sans 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
We don't have rights to decide other women situation or where she belong to and she should do or not. . Also women are not only belong to kitchen. They can be anywhere and they can do their duty when ever perfectly. If a pregnant woman choose to be in battle field she might have a good reason for that. And a woman choose to run a kitchen it's also the her situation and circumstance. And another matter there will be a battle field in each and every one life even it may not contain weapons or rockets.
2006-08-05 03:47:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by mswathi1025 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I completley agree. I don't think that American women are barefoot and pregnant, though. Look back to WW II. Because of the srtong women that supported the men at war, this nation kept rolling along. I don't think that women belong in battle, and I hate to see how politically correct that the Army and our fighting forces have become because of the women in it. Women disrupt the "Brotherhood" that men share together in battle, they distract from the mission (Yes, horny men will even still find the biggest butch dyke attractive) and no matter what anyone says, are not physically strong enough to assert themselves on the battlefield. Men were made to be our protectors. I am not saying that women are useless in the Military. The Army and the Navy couldn't function without them in everything else but in the front line units. I, for one, am sick of seeing women be men and men being spineless weenies. Just to clarify....my opinion is based on women being on the front lines, not in support units, where our men despratley need their support!
2006-08-05 03:42:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Nag 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I truly believe it depends on the woman. Some women are just good with strategy, and combative areas. Where as others wouldn't have a clue. (The same goes for men) So I believe that its the woman's choice, along with her skills. If she is on the battle field for good reasons, and can do her job appropriately, then by all means allow her to defend our country and fight for what she believes in. Now, on the other hand, if she can not fulfill her duties, or is using her gender as a crutch (or embarrassment by her actions - sexual nature etc.) then send her home, and out of our armed forces. Same would apply to men.
2006-08-05 03:40:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by ~Untold Wisdom~ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Come on! You are practicing sophistry in presenting such an either or choice.
If you haven't heard, there are physiological differences between the genders. Do you understand the nature of battlefield conditions and physical stress?
Of course, you only know war through the movies. Do you really want to be buddied up with a person do can't, through genetics, pull their weight, and, as a result, puts your butt and the entire platoon's butt on the line? I don't think that you are ready to die for some abstract notion of equality of the genders.
I can just see Marie Osmond or Suzanne Somers staring in "Band of Brothers" or "Black hawk Down".
2006-08-05 03:49:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ElOsoBravo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like women, but I think they would be to much of a distraction on a battle field. I'm NOT saying they can't do the job, however they would be a distraction to everyone in the field.
Barefoot and pregnant? If they like that sort of thing I guess.
2006-08-05 03:37:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Colonel 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where ever that woman feels she is doing her best work, is where she should be. There are some women that just belong on the battlefield, and some that belong in the kitchen scrubbing the floor, and there ae some that belong in between somewhere. I know full well that there are some MEN that don't belong on the battlefield, and would do better else where. AND WHO THE FU(K ARE YOU TO DECIDE???
2006-08-05 03:40:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Loki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, the US doesn't allow women into combat situations. US soldiers on the front line are fully testiclized! :)
That being said, women should be allowed to fight on the front line if they choose. AS the pro-abortion people like to say, it's their body. Let them decide what to do with it.
As for the US testicles... the Israeli army allows women in, and they'll kick any of their neighbors arses.
2006-08-05 03:38:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by jon_r_patrick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
While "All men are created equal" basis entitles women to choose freely, because of the way they are made in terms of physical strength, speed, and other attributes, they will be better off to choose behind the line positions than the front line positions in a real war.
2006-08-05 03:43:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by stvenryn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not On the battle field.
2006-08-05 03:36:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not everyone (male or female) can handle combat.......but how does putting the more viscous of the 2 genders on the battlefield make America lack balls? Ever get between a mother and her young? HOOAH!!!! SFC Victoria Johnson (retired)
2006-08-05 03:48:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by Victhechic 3
·
0⤊
0⤋