Are you for or against the fat tax?

Answer 1

I am for it. People, it's not a tax for being overweight, it's a tax on food with a high fat content, such as hot dogs and potatoe chips. If nothing else this tax will at least increase American awareness of the crap we put in our mouths. With much of the world starving to death they should rename it the selfishness tax and see if the approval rating goes up.

Answer 2

I'm against it. If we allow this tax, where will we draw the line? I think that it opens the doors for the government to tax us to no end. What is next the fun tax? Or maybe the danger tax?

The government already has enough of our money. They should take that money and put it to better use.

Answer 3

properly the gay marriage subject be counted must be with the aid of fact of your non secular persuasion (enable's settle for it that's the only explanation why that's against the regulation). in spite of the incontrovertible fact that your faith in all likelihood does no longer be so predetermined on a fat tax. till you type it as gluttony. So a conservative view factor (which tend to be greater non secular based) you're able to danger a wager as being against gay marriage and for a fat tax. A liberal view, could concentration on equality. as a result a common liberal ought to have the stance of being for gay marriage and against the fat tax. My own one with the fat tax argument is that if we tax human beings for being fat (with the aid of fact reasons a tension on the wellbeing device) then ought to we tax human beings for enjoying activities (with the aid of fact think of of each and all of the injuries activities incur to individuals). it may additionally be like the tobacco and alcohol taxes, do no longer end the subject (manage the affliction) in basic terms help supply investment for the subjects (manage the indicators). You objective lowering human beings transforming into obese in the 1st place and the tax is redundant (non-mandatory). coverage firms ought to cost greater for obesity too (a private sector approach to motivate a healthful weight).

Answer 4

We should have the dumb tax, the arrogant tax, the anorexic tax. Lets tax anyone who might have a disease or a charector flaw.... not. What a ridiculous idea.

The only people who need to be paying more taxes are the obscenely rich because they can afford it.

Answer 5

Against. How are you going to tax someone extra just because they want to buy a twinkie? thats just stupid. They dont have an extra tax because someone chooses to drink. They dont have a tax because someone chooses to be a moron. Therefore they shouldnt tax this either.

But this is coming from a fattie :-)

Answer 6

Against, even I am not fat, I eat a lot of fat food.

Answer 7

Against. The government has better things to do than to "police" the food we eat. I can't believe they'd even consider it.

Answer 8

Im completely for it and whatsmore i think it shuould be illegal to be a fat slob and be punishable by prison. Most fat people are fat purely because they are greeedy and selfish

Answer 9

what? like a tax for being overwieght? yeah totally cause then half the people in the united states would be flat broke!!!

Answer 10

against