I for one think that it was especially now that Charles is with that ugly Camela .
2006-08-05 00:30:02 · 37 answers · asked by Tash x 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
for goodness sake let it rest its been nine years since she died
im sick of papers and news goin on bout theorys but they should let it lie let her rest in peace end of
2006-08-05 00:37:02 · answer #1 · answered by ellejaybea 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Regarding Camilla, people forget the substantial age difference between Charles and Di. Isn't it likely that Charles and Camilla have more in common?
The royal family is known as "the firm". This is because it's not like an ordinary family, hence our fascination with them. Those born into these circles adapt better than those from other circles, even relatively close ones. It's a weird world they move in. Diana didn't adapt well and it was quite clear that in some respects she didn't understand either her "place" nor the full obligations of her "duty".
This can be seen by her affair with Dodi Al-Fayed. Son of an Egyptian merchant, denied a UK passport for suspicious business dealings and yes, a muslim - UK law still has a thing about catholicism and sovereignty so what would it make of Islam!?
Mohammed (the father) had bought the Duke of Windsor's house outside of Paris. The Duke of Windsor was the title of the ex-King Edward 8th who abdicated in great scandal in the 30's after marrying a divorcee. It is to this house that the couple were heading on the night of the accident.
During this affair, not only were the press tailing the pair, but the secret services also. Early editions of newspapers from the day she died described how MI6 had flown from Paris to Balmoral to brief the royals on the day of the accident. Obviously, this story disappeared for a while after the accident.
My opinion? If it was an accident, it was a "lucky one" in some respects. There was a very real chance of Al-Fayed establishing the people's princess in a royal residence, in exile, with a direct link to a future monarch - William. The prospect of this would clearly terrify the establishment, as it would be considered as an alternative royal family, a thorn in the side.
2006-08-05 01:20:52 · answer #2 · answered by sd5 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Their affairs are none of your business. I think you should mind your own business. And the swipe at Camela looks reflects poorly on you. You should not judge people by their looks. But to answer your question, Di wasn't killed. She (and two others I have to remind you young lady) were just run off the road by some pretty irresponsible media whores who should have gone to jail for reckless driving. But clearly there was no intent to murder.
2006-08-05 01:44:32 · answer #3 · answered by John16 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, of course not. It's what the media want you to believe! It's so easy to manipulate people. It was a speeding accident caused by drink and being chased by reporters. However disturbed and badly behaved she was Charlie wouldn't do that. He'd probably just ignore her and carry on with Camilla, who he should have married in the first place if she hadn't gone off and married someone else.
Diana was glamorous, especially after she married Charles and had lots of money for clothes and advisors to tell her what suited her, but she was a deeply wounded young woman (hurt during her childhood, by whom we do not know, but can only speculate) Think for yourself, don't allow yourself to be manipulated by people who's only interest is in making money out of you by selling you sensationalist stories. It is so evil, what's being done by the media. If you were a famous person the media would try to destroy you too. It's what they do.
2006-08-12 22:33:41 · answer #4 · answered by survivor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i think it was planned, but as with all cover-ups the truth will come out at some time. we have a 'freedom of information' act that i believe wont cover that particular story yet
but maybe at some point in the future it will.
why take her body to the mortuary/morgue (whichever it is) in france and embalm it...if it was an accident as reported then the authorities should have had family take her home and do what was neccessary in her home country not rush to embalm the body...unless family consent was given, but that would have been before the 'accident' or very soon after...either way, it all sounds iffy, why do so unless there is something to hide
2006-08-07 02:07:27 · answer #5 · answered by ali1ukbradford 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a huge Princess Diane fan and have recently read a few of her books, and I for one am convinced that she was killed as a way for Charles to marry the ugly bat he's with now...
2006-08-05 00:34:01 · answer #6 · answered by Csue39 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Indeed i do!
1. Diana was going to marry Dodi and was probably pregnant to him (Why else would her husband have her embalmed as quick as he did (Against the law because it didn't allow for a second post mortem) and we all know ... The Monarchy wouldn't have wanted the king to be's ex wife married to a muslim.
2. When anyone as important as Diana dies ... The enquiry is immediate, witnesses hunted down until they're found. no one knows what happened to the people in the litle Fiat, in fact it was never found! Wiotnesses who said they had seen a bike as well as another car at which point Henry paul had started to drive erratically were either not found or else dismissed as being unreliable. Yeah! Well they were more reliable than any enquiry made and because they had much more to say ... They got dismissed.
3. Henry Paul was a professional driver, working at the Ritz hotel. Places like that would never allow one of their drivers to drink (Never mind take drugs as well) when on duty! The guy would have been told to hop it and sacked on the spot. And had he really been drunk, taken drugs, he wouldn't have made it as far as he did, the erratic driving they talked about would have been from the moment he started the car, not after a while! Watch any drunk driver starting off and driving ... They drive erratically from the moment they start.
4. The Queen wanted to be top notch, and loved as much as Diana. She wasn't. why? Because Diana was a people's person, the Queen never was. Diana had heart, she had a fantastic personality, she was bubbly, full of life, intelligent and cared about others, she was a person married to a royal. The Queen, her dreadful children are not persons, only royals who happen to be one gender or another.
5. The Queen wanted Charles to be reunited with Camilla. Why else would she had put up with her son having an affair from day 1 of his marriage, continuing with what had happened for goodness knows how long.
6. Charles and the Queen wanted to have William and Harry to themselves to groom them to be royals and nothing else. Diana stood in the way because she wanted her children to be children! Normal kids, not zombies as the rest of the Windsor clan. It was a well known fact she hated Diana, her husband hated her as well and as for Charles, he was always the most egocentrist, obnoxious man ever, and it siuted him to have Diana disappear and if that meant murder so be it.
But you know ... Camilla will join them all on their judgement day ... They'll all end up tried by powers they can't buy or intimidate, God! And it wouldn't matter if they have a lovely funeral, not that i would attend any of them, get buried with their crown ... They'll still end up in hell for eternity.
2006-08-05 00:50:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have always believed there was more to the 'accident' than we will ever know. We probably will never know either as the government departments will bury the truth. I am not an ardent royalist, nor was I a particular fan of Diana, but how she was treated by the 'family, the press and the paparazzi, was all wrong. No matter who or what she was, she didn't deserve that, and nor did those sons of hers.
2006-08-05 00:33:31 · answer #8 · answered by SunnyDays 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if it had anything to do with Camela but yes I too believe there was something way to fishy there... a shame really
2006-08-05 00:32:47 · answer #9 · answered by kitkool 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes yes yes yes. i think charles and prince phillip planned it so no one could get in the way of charles and that witch camela!!!!!
i fill so sorry for harry and william they have no idea how evil there dad is!!!
in time the truth will come out!!!!
2006-08-05 00:37:07 · answer #10 · answered by alan h 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but it seems to me the cause was that she was followed a lot. New stories have come out about how she was followed by the British government. Anyone who participated in this is partly responsible. They could easily see before the accident that their behavior of tailing her was causing her and her drivers to flee, sometimes recklessly.
I hope you get a lot references, links here, so I can read some of the new theories.
2006-08-05 00:33:56 · answer #11 · answered by TxSup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋