2006-08-04 23:26:47 · 10 answers · asked by mashar 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, they just want to live and prosper!
2006-08-04 23:31:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel must withdraw from Lebanon if there is no more treat of terrorism because it is the reason why it crossed the border to pursue the Hezbollah guerillas. Otherwise, the UN must force its wiithdrawal.
2006-08-05 06:32:04 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel's defence forces were yesterday condemned for systematically and deliberately targeting civilians in Lebanon, acts which the respected New York organisation Human Rights Watch described as "serious violations of international law" or war crimes.
The number of Lebanese killed in the 23-day conflict is now close to 900, the vast majority of them civilians, and a quarter of Lebanon's population is in flight. Although the Israeli government claims it is taking all possible measures to minimise civilian harm, Human Rights Watch said their detailed investigations revealed "a systematic failure by the Israeli Defence Forces to distinguish between combatants and civilians". The 50-page report flatly accuses Israeli forces of launching artillery and air attacks "with limited or dubious military gain but excessive civilian cost".
"In HUNDREDS of attacks, Israeli forces struck an area with no apparently military target," the report states.
In a particularly damning section it concludes that "in some cases, the timing and intensity of the attack, the absence of a military target, as well as return strikes against rescuers, suggest that Israeli forces deliberately targeted civilians".
In its central allegation, Human Rights Watch accuses Israel of violating one of the most fundamental tenets of the laws of war: the duty to carry out attacks only on military targets
There is no specific international ban on cluster bombs, but their use in or near civilians is considered an indiscriminate attack, and therefore a war crime, because they cannot be directed in a way that distinguishes between military and civilian targets.
The report examines the air strike on Qana last Saturday, which sparked international outrage and intensified calls for a ceasefire. Human Rights Watch reveals that 28 people died in the attack rather than the 54 originally reported by Lebanese rescue workers. The report details how Israeli warplanes attacked a three-storey building in which 63 members of two extended families were sheltering. At least 22 people are now known to have escaped and 13 remain unaccounted for, presumably buried under the rubble.
2006-08-05 06:45:09 · answer #3 · answered by Biomimetik 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course not. Maybe in 67 there woiuld have been but now everyone just wants to live a peaceful life except those who want revenge or the death of a father or son....
2006-08-05 10:18:51 · answer #4 · answered by Woody 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and so would the USA from the Middle East
2006-08-05 06:30:18 · answer #5 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No more war period !
Both sides stop the B. S.
That means all parties ,including and most importantly, all militias.
The actions of some bad apples have caused years of hate and bloodshed.
for your childrens sake , it's time for peace .
2006-08-05 06:57:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way!
The Israelis are blood addicts, They love to occupy territories and kill innocent civilians.
I am sure they will find another good reason for quinching their thurst with blood.
2006-08-05 06:59:47 · answer #7 · answered by I-Rahi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agrre with I-Rahy's answer
2006-08-05 07:40:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, what would they have to gain by staying
2006-08-05 06:31:16 · answer #9 · answered by mack j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
israel will made terrorist to fight them,
2006-08-05 06:36:39 · answer #10 · answered by tobias p 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋