English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so what would be the outcome if oil wasnt available

2006-08-04 22:40:52 · 15 answers · asked by marysue52uk 2 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

15 answers

not only oil
a much greater agenda
see it here
u wont find this on CNN,FOXNEWS.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/

2006-08-04 22:49:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, since Iraq supplies only 5% of our oil, I sincerely doubt that.
Here are the top 15 countries the US imported from. Using the oil theory, we would have invaded poorly defended Canada and Mexico by now.

2006-08-05 05:51:33 · answer #2 · answered by Doggzilla 6 · 0 0

Honestly I think we went to Iraq because Saddam Hussein Threatened to kill G.W. Bush's daddy. I think he came in to office wanting to kick Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti out of power.

If there wasn't oil in the middle east none of these radicals would not have enough money to make any difference to anyone except themselves. We made these people powerful by making them rich.

2006-08-05 05:53:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We are in this war because American voters elected a dumbshit President. If oil wasn't available our ecomomy would crash, but the Islamic radicals would still hate us because we are in their land and they consider Westerners barbarians.

2006-08-05 05:54:16 · answer #4 · answered by wally4u_1968 3 · 0 0

Nothing. Of course the Bush family came there for revenge (don't touch my papa) and the oil.

2006-08-05 05:47:27 · answer #5 · answered by neshama 5 · 0 0

Its not just the oil we have to rid ourselves of all who want to destroy us because they feel that as an Americans we have to good of a life style for our own good.

Don't forget that Satan sent the Arabs not God.

2006-08-05 05:48:33 · answer #6 · answered by realdream1 4 · 0 0

Yes. I'm sure if oil wasn't involved, the conflict would be long over.

2006-08-05 05:45:03 · answer #7 · answered by Meirelle 2 · 0 0

No, it's because Bush is a loose cannon who imagines he is the saviour of democracy.

2006-08-05 05:53:09 · answer #8 · answered by Scabius Fretful 5 · 0 0

America would have just proven what we all know and screwed its self and would have tom move to a cleaner fuel

2006-08-05 05:44:53 · answer #9 · answered by fed001001 2 · 0 0

We would take over their country for pistachios. Also, other perishables like camels milk.

2006-08-05 05:55:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

who knows anymore? suppossedly because Bush said Saddum was hiding weapons of mass destruction and killing thousands of innocent people.

2006-08-05 05:51:40 · answer #11 · answered by me 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers