2006-08-04 22:39:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes of course. The olympics are a great way to highlight all the positive changes that have been going on in chicago for the past decade. The trick will be keeping it from backsliding for another decade.
2006-08-04 22:43:52 · answer #1 · answered by Charles D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not after Daley (illegally) bulldozed the runway at Meigs Field in the Middle of the night. Several aircraft parked there were stranded for days until the FAA intervened. I would not got to Chicago if they were handing our One hundred dollar bills on the street corners.
I cannot prove Daley is a crook, and I would Never call him one in public
but I really do not understand how the good people of Chi town could elect this "character".
Having the Olympics there I vote no.
How about just returning to Atlanta, all the facilities are already built,
Why burden the taxpayers to spend ALOT of money to construct the various venues to accommodate the Olympics just so the politicians can feel good about themselves for "bringing the Olympic to MY town" and give their buddies the contracts to do the work. Just MNHO
2006-08-05 05:55:23 · answer #2 · answered by cherokeeflyer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the last few Olympic games have been money losers for the host city. the only good thing about hosting the games, is the amount of world wide press. but a city like Chicago is already known worldwide
2006-08-05 05:50:15 · answer #3 · answered by my45tysondog 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES
chicago is a great city
2006-08-05 05:44:22 · answer #4 · answered by Unl0veable 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes thats means it won't be here
2006-08-05 05:45:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and no.
depends
2006-08-05 05:45:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not in chicago too much crime....
2006-08-05 05:43:18 · answer #7 · answered by Schmitz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋