Guys, you are not alone with this - I am Australian and our Government gives so much money to other countries it makes me mad.
A lot of the money given goes into the pockets of their crooked politicians and law keeping forces. It would be far wiser to give tractors, machinery, clothing, food, education, etc. That way there is a better chance of it getting to the people who need it.
I believe that Charity begins at home - get your own house in order before you go giving it away so freely when our own people need it more.
When Indonesia had the big sunami, Australia sent money, the army, medical people and experienced tradespeople to help rebuild. Funny, you know, a lot of the money had disappeared, I wonder - can we guess who got it.
Also, when we have major disasters in Australia, no one comes to our aid and what about the USA when they have major disasters - who comes to their aid. Is it because we help others that they think that its a one way street and we dont need the help.
There has been a lot of help from the USA when we have the big bush fires and I know we have sent out firefighters to the USA to help out.
Australia has a very small population and yet we give so much, I think it is about time we stopped and looked to our home shores before we give out anymore charity - then maybe we should be more selective.
Yes, it pisses me off also.
2006-08-04 21:38:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by the_knowing2 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I agree we as a group are not doing enough to help folks that do not have homes. However, we must all understand that some people are not healthy enought to decide what is best for themselves and what is healthy and what is not.
We need institutions in place that will allow both parties to determine the best corrective action for the patient and the communiy.
2006-08-04 21:30:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by slckid2004 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You do seem to be slightly uninformed about many things... the poor and homeless are well taken care of by voluteer groups often receiving food from the stores of the FDA.. I dare say you lead a very sheltered life or, are very prone to accepting propaganda, put out by certain groups.
2006-08-04 21:30:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The reason why the government act like this is to make great attention to things abroad and it is commonly used by dictatorially governments to lead the public opinion to other things than what takes place in their own country. To act like this is one of the rules in Retorike Techne, how to speak and act to mislead the court in the ancient Greece and as you know by now it can be used and is commonly used by those we once vote for.
2006-08-04 21:43:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Realname: Robert Siikiniemi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They do take care of their own country. That is Halliburton and oil companies now making billions of dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Overcharging the U.S. gov't. Also the top 5% of Americans who gets the most tax cuts.
2006-08-04 21:31:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by tyrone b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do a search for the truth about foreign aid. You will be very surprised what the results are. Make up your own mind and try to read as many different opinions as you can.
2006-08-04 21:34:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Thomas S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Were taking down threats to our country, Terrorist and Crazy Dictators are more of a threat to our Country than Social Security right now..
2006-08-04 21:22:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by DC D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're wrong. It's not saving them. This country's government has control over itself. Now we practically own another. How many other countries exist on this planet? How many can we gain control of? This government will rule the world. We won't see it, but we will see it's beginning reign. Open your eyes...
www.loosechange911.com
~Just My 0.02
2006-08-04 21:24:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by salvagedrover 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually the US government DOES NOT take care of the hungry and the poor in every country. Rather, it cares for killing their children and raping their teenagers ... as is going in Iraq and Lebanon
2006-08-04 21:25:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by sniper 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your situation is amazingly valid. We do would desire to look after our homeless, hungry and unwell. i've got in my opinion been one to ask your self why those, no longer in basic terms the yank stars, however the so-stated as one million% billionnaires that have extra money than they'd ever spend, does not see to it that no person in usa would be homeless. in the event that they'd see to it that shelters would be outfitted in each state, it might make an significant distinction for the homeless. which would be considered one of my objectives if i'd ever come right into a billionnaire prestige. And as for Metastop, who says that the government is scuffling with agencies from getting available and doing their element, this isn't any longer actual. they're available doing their element very nicely. although, this is for themselves and not for the homeless, hungry and unwell. in the event that they have been questioning approximately human beings, with all of the money they have, the President does not would desire to be scuffling with for the low earning and center type human beings to survive. there is the thank you to repair this united states in the event that they're going to paintings at the same time for the sturdy of the rustic and not for social gathering rhetoric on the two aspects. Stalemating never works, and would no longer be if the questioning is for what's right for us and our protection on all fronts. as quickly as we vote rhetoric into workplace, we make a large mistake. we would desire to consistently look at what their accomplishments have been fairly than what a guy or woman says that would sound sturdy for our social gathering first, and not questioning ourselves, is what they're asserting sturdy for we, the persons - prosperous or undesirable? i'm hoping we can actual do this earlier we placed a risky guy or woman interior the white homestead. no longer in basic terms as a results of fact my social gathering is dictating to me what I ought to think of, or whether you like the way he/she sounds fairly than checking him/her out thoroughly to work out what their heart is like and how they are in a position to convey the perfect to no longer in basic terms the yank human beings, yet actual empathy for different worldwide places besides.
2016-09-28 22:29:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋